Autor: Tradutores

Um fantástico sucesso para J.K. Rowling

Tradução: Frede_Potter
Revisão: Adriana Snape

Gilson, Nancy. “A Fantastic Success for J.K. Rowling,” Columbus Dispatch (Ohio), October 28, 1999

On her frenzied American tour, British author J.K. Rowling was signing copies of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone when a small boy eagerly approached her.

His words tumbled out in one breath:

“I know what the title of your next book is. I know what it is. It’s Harry Potter and the Quidditch World Cup!”

Rowling, a slight woman with strawberry-blond hair, paused to recall the episode, then spoke again in her crisp British accent.

“Every other time a kid has said this to me, I’ve said, ‘No, that’s a rumor; that’s not the title.’ But he was so pleased with himself that he thought he knew it, and he was only about 5, so I said: ‘That’s right. You’re absolutely right.’ And I thought, ‘He’ll deal with it later.’ ”

The anecdote demonstrates not only the immense popularity of her Harry Potter fantasy series but also her compassion for young readers.

Joanne Kathleen Rowling (rhymes with bowling) is well aware that such fanatical followers consider Harry, Hermione, Ron and the other members of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry like family.

Her first three Harry Potter books are at Nos. 1, 2 and 3 on most best-seller lists. More than 8.2 million copies of the books, which have been translated into 28 languages, are in print in the United States.

As a single mother who spent a few months on welfare, Rowling wrote part of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone (changed to Sorcerer’s Stone in the American version) in a Scottish cafe, nursing a cup of coffee while her young daughter slept.

She was born near Bristol, England, and knew by age 6 that she wanted to become a writer. A bright student, she attended a state-run school (not a boarding school) in Chapstow, then Exeter University. She majored in French, taught high school in Portugal, married, divorced, then returned to England.

There, while riding on a train, the idea for Harry Potter and Hogwarts came to her “very nearly fully blown.”

The popularity of her books seems to have sprung up likewise.

Recently, Rowling granted an early-afternoon interview at the Four Seasons hotel. (On the street below, adults and children — some of them wearing costumes and toting broomsticks — lined up in front of the Borders bookstore where she would appear that evening.)

Q: How did Harry Potter originate?

A: Harry was always a boy, and he was always Harry, but he wasn’t always Potter; he had two other surnames. I won’t tell you what they were, partly because I’m about to use one of them for another character in book four.

I’ve thought about why I didn’t choose a heroine, but I didn’t want to change him. He was too real to me, and it would have felt very contrived to feminize him. . . . There are plenty of strong females in the books. Hermione is a caricature of me when I was younger. Of Harry, Ron and Hermione, she’s definitely the brainpower.

Q: Will Harry find romance in book four?

A: He tries, but he doesn’t get very far.

They’re all kind of after the wrong people, as in life. Hermione gets the first date, and it’s quite a cool one because I thought I owed her a bit of fun.

Q: Harry excels at Quidditch, a team sport played on broomstick — and similar to soccer?

A: No, it’s more like hockey, but they score through hoops like basketball.

Basketball is my favorite sport to watch. It’s not that popular in Britain. I was in Portugal when I started following the Chicago Bulls. When I got back to Britain, I had to wait until 3 a.m. to watch basketball on television.

Q: A group in South Carolina contends that your books contain violence and promote witchcraft. One woman wants them kept out of certain classrooms. How do you respond?

A: Of course, people have a right to decide what their children read, but I don’t think they have the right to decide what other people’s children read.

No children’s book is going to make everyone happy, nor should it. Children’s literature, like any literature, is there to stimulate people. If they think I’m out to promote witchcraft, they’re very much mistaken.

Children are very smart. This is a fantasy world in which they totally immerse themselves and enjoy. Then they put the book down and go back to real life.

Q: Children know that a death or two will occur in the next books, and they’re worried about some characters — particularly Ron and Hagrid the groundskeeper. Do you pay attention to such concerns?

A: For five years, this was my internal world. It’s still the most amazing thing to meet one person, let alone hordes of people, who knows these characters.

It’s heartwarming that people care enough about them to want them not to get hurt, but at the same time I have the absolute right to do what I like to my story and characters. I’m not going to write to order. I’ve planned the whole story, and I’ve always known who was going to die and who was going to come through unscathed, and I’m not going to deviate from that.

Q: Have you read Harry Potter to your 6-year-old daughter?

A: I didn’t think she was ready for the books, but she begged and begged, so I’m currently reading them to her. We finished the first, and we’re halfway through Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. I was very nervous; it’s really the most important reading of my life, isn’t it? She cries at the end of each chapter and says: “I want more. I want more.”

Q: The book jackets for the American and British versions differ. Do you have a favorite?

A: I love the American edition of the books. They look like my fantasy of the books before they were published.

I’ve now seen 26 different versions, and the American is my favorite. . . . The Italians took off Harry’s glasses. . . . I guess they couldn’t have a hero in glasses. I didn’t like that very much.

The Germans have a very angular Harry. He looks harder somehow.

Q: What plans are being made for Harry Potter, the movie?

A: It’s in the very early stages. Summer of 2001 is the target date. I have script approval, and I’m in close contact with the writer.

Among the things that swayed me to Warner Bros. were the movies The Little Princess and The Secret Garden. . . . They treated the books with respect and made changes where it absolutely made sense.

Q: Will there be a TV show?

A: No, I think a film is quite enough. There will be some merchandise with the film. That’s the way it goes. If it’s stuff kids can play with meaningfully, like dress-up clothes, that’s great.

Q: Are you surprised by the number of adults reading Harry Potter?

A: I’m flattered. I wrote these books for me. I wrote what I wanted to read and what I thought I would have liked to read when I was younger.

Q: Do you feel trapped by a seven-book series?

A: Not at all. If I’m always known as a children’s writer, that is just fine. . . . And I am utterly resigned to the fact that I probably will never again write books that are this popular. I will always be very, very proud of these books.

Q: Do you think you’ve changed contemporary literature for children?

A: Three or four publishers turned down Harry Potter for various reasons, but each and every one of them said that it was too long.

I couldn’t cut it. There had been several children’s books that were 150 pages that were very successful, and that seemed to be what sold. But I’ve met so many kids on this tour, and, when I tell them that No. 4 will be the longest book yet, they all say, “Yes!”

consulte Mais informação

Encantados com a literatura de Potter

Tradução: {patylda}
Revisão: Adriana Snape
*OK Categorias e Conteúdo

Takahama, Valerie. “Enchanted with Potter Literature: Fans line up for hours to get their books signed,” The Orange County Register (Santa Ana, CA), 26 October 1999

Everyone at Whale of a Tale Children’s Bookshoppe in Irvine on Monday was wild about Harry. Harry Potter, that is.

He’s the sorcerer’s apprentice who stars in the wildly popular series of children’s books that are Nos. 1, 2 and 3 on the New York Times best-sellers list. And an appearance by Harry’s creator, J.K. Rowling, drew hundreds and hundreds of Potter fans to the University Center store.

The Pottermaniacs – and their parents and grandparents – began arriving before dawn for the evening signing.

“I read all three (books) in 12 days. That’s 1,086 pages,” said Jaci Cheskes-Harris, 9, whose father got to the store at 5 a.m. and was second in line.

Sales were limited to 800 books – a drop in the bucket compared to the 8.2 million copies of the three books in print, but not enough to satisfy everyone who showed up.

The Pottermaniacs came in all sizes and ages.

“I always say we’re tall children,” said Suzanne Schaefer, 50, who arrived at 7:30 a.m. to secure spots in line for herself and her husband.

Once inside the store, fans filed quickly past a tired-looking Rowling, who wore jeans, a simple shirt and a wrist brace on her right arm. Despite the rigors of a whirlwind national tour that began Oct. 11 and had taken her to Ventura in the morning, the author seemed genuinely pleased to meet her fans and answer their questions.

“Is it Voldemort?” “Or Voldemor?” someone asked about Harry’s evil nemesis.

“I say ‘Voldemor’ but I’m the only one,” Rowling, who’s from Edinburgh, said with a slight Scottish burr.

“Yes, Harry. You came!” she said to Charles Pollock, 9, who wore a cape with an owl on his shoulder, a pair of taped horn-rimmed spectacles and a lightning bolt drawn on his forehead.

consulte Mais informação

Não há final à vista para a Pottermania

Tradução: Frede_Potter
Revisão: {patylda}

Tucker, Ernest. “No end in sight for Pottermania,” Chicago Sun-Times, October 22, 1999

Nothing’s hotter than Harry Potter.

Even the character’s creator, British author J.K. Rowling, can’t answer why everyone is bewitched by the best-selling, multivolume saga about an orphan who discovers on his 11th birthday he’s a famous wizard.

“I started writing these books for me. I never expected this in my wildest dreams,” the 34-year-old former teacher said in the midst of her U.S. tour, which arrives in Chicago today. “What emerges from what children tell me is that they identify with one of the three main characters: Harry, Ron or Hermione.”

The three Potter books – part of a projected series of seven – are stacked up at the top of the New York Times best-seller list where the first, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, has been for more than 40 weeks. At last count, 8.2 million copies of the books were in print in America alone.

Since the first of three Potter books was released in America in August 1998, rampant Pottermania has been bubbling like a witch’s cauldron. It will be at full boil when the author returns to Chicago for two days of book signings.

Still trying to catch their breaths, booksellers and childhood experts are beginning to try to explain the phenomenon.

“The supersonic (sales) boom occurred about two months ago and has something to do with children going back to school,” said Richard Howorth, president of the 3,200-member American Booksellers Association. Howorth, who owns Square Books in Oxford, Miss., said, “Apparently, every child between the third and seventh grade in America is reading this book along with their moms and dads. Even adults without children are reading it.”

A tremendous word-of-mouth is behind the surge, said a spokeswoman for Scholastic Publishing, which introduced the American edition of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone in 1998, a year after the original was published in England.

Gillian McNamee, an early childhood expert at the Erickson Institute in Chicago, whose own 10-year-old reads Harry, noted that children can easily relate to the books. “Kids are starved for play in a magical place,” she said. “As they move into their middle years, they haven’t lost the love to pretend.”

“It’s the story. Harry is somebody you can admire, who does remarkably well, given his circumstance,” said Rose Joseph, co-owner of the Magic Tree bookstore, 141 N. Oak Park Ave., Oak Park. “Kids realize it’s not real, but they love his overcoming adversity. And the author is wonderfully imaginative.”

It’s not likely that Pottermania will wane any time soon – especially with so many primed for the next installment’s arrival in the summer of 2000: Top Hollywood filmmakers, including Steven Spielberg, are reported inte

consulte Mais informação

Simplesmente loucos por Harry

Tradução: {patylda}
Revisão:

Hulbert, Dan. “Just wild about Harry: Dedicated fans of a young wizard have Scottish scribe J.K. Rowling to thank,” The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, October 22, 1999

Let the owls go forth!

And let them spread the news — as they do so well in the tales of “Harry Potter,” the all-around regular nice kid who happens to be a wizard — that Harry’s fabulously hot Scottish creator, J.K. Rowling, is now among us.

Or will be shortly: Her flight was delayed. There’s more ominous news this cool, clear fall evening that her book-signing wrist is sore and numb. But no matter! Hundreds of kids are covering what used to be the front lawn of Hobbit Hall Children’s Bookstore in Roswell — many with Harry’s trademark lightning bolt painted on their foreheads — crowding between TV satellite- dish vans and hoping for a glimpse of the shy, slender author as she slips in to her book signing.

“She’s not here yet!” a preteen girl shouts hoarsely to her friends across the yard.

The real action is in the back yard. Here are the 400 kids, with parents, who started lining up early enough (six hours ago) to get passes to the signing by the woman they simply call “She” or “Her” (few seem to know even that the J in J.K. stands for Joanne). The scene is somewhere between a carnival and a Hollywood premiere that skews young (8 to 12, on average). Security guards mutter wearily into walkie-talkies. A guy in a kilt plays the bagpipes. Still Elvis, so to speak, has not yet entered the building.

“She will not come in unless the deck is cleared!” cries a harried store employee.

Weird, in this day and age, to see such mass excitement for wit, narrative, character and wholesome moral values (along with a few troll boogers, just for flavor). All conveyed in that form of communication that is supposedly so over: the printed page.

“I love Harry because he’s funny and has guts and he’s my age,” says Jonathan Davis of Woodstock, 11. “Nobody notices him in the real world, then he goes to wizard school and — look out!”

Look out, indeed: Suddenly there She is, standing on the elevated deck as if she magically apparated there. Rowling (rhymes with bowling) waves and a cheer goes up from the crowd. The hottest author on the planet (her “Potter” books command the top three slots on The New York Times Bestseller List) then ducks inside to begin signing fresh copies of her newest book as fast as her Ace-bandaged wrist will allow. The kids look a bit dazed, hustled through the stuffy little room crammed with TV cameramen. Then, a local boy walks in dressed in a scarlet wizard robe and Rowling cries with relief, “Harry! I’ve been waiting for you! You can help me sign these.”

Anything but mundane

The next day, following a professional wrist massage, looking around the hotel suite where her publisher, Scholastic Press, has booked her interviews, the 34-year-old Rowling sounds like a sightseer visiting someone else’s amazing life.

“Cool!” she says, surveying the posh surroundings and royal view. “Wish I had time to actually look around this place.”

Taking a seat, she describes her own household: Rowling has a daughter, Jessica, 6, “and a rabbit named Jemimah and a guinea pig named Jasmine, and anybody who’d like to take them off my hands, you’re welcome.” Not Jessica, of course. “My house is quite mundane,” she goes on, and though she was photographed with a stone gargoyle in Time magazine, “That belonged to the photographer, and he’s the weird one, not me.” As to significant others, the divorced author says, “I love reading about other people’s love lives, not mine. So, no comment.”

Rowling has a face you can’t stop watching, with the offbeat beauty of a brainy romantic lead in an art film. Someone whose flashes of delighted mischief filter through an air of gentle melancholy. Someone who might start writing her first novel on the backs of envelopes in a cafe in a cloudy, classy old burg like Edinburgh — which happens to be the case.

If Harry travels a long way — from a miserable orphaned childhood in the Muggle World (where you and I live) to his true calling as celebrity wizard in a parallel universe — Rowling had an equally remarkable journey. Just a few years ago she was unpublished and between teaching jobs, raising her infant daughter on a welfare check (she was only briefly on the dole, but the British press seized upon that phase to build a Rowling legend).

After three British publishers passed on the book, one finally accepted it but advised Rowling to use her initials on the theory that boys wouldn’t read her if they knew she was a woman.

“Then I went on the telly, boys kept reading like mad, and that theory was pretty well blown out of the water,” Rowling says with a husky laugh.

“I was six months into creating Harry (in 1990) before I asked myself why I wasn’t making him a heroine, since I obviously am female,” she continues. ” But by then I was so fond of Harry, and believed in him so strongly, that I wasn’t about to send him out in a dress. It’s funny, when I was teaching (French), I was placed in charge of all-boy classes because it was considered my forte. Just recently, someone asked me why I don’t have stronger female characters and I was offended, because I consider Hermione (Harry’s goody- goody, but fearless, sidekick) quite strong. Hermione’s a kind of caricature of me at 11, but then, there’s a lot of me in Harry, too.”

The third member of Harry’s intrepid crew, fighting hidden evils at the Hogwarts school of wizardry, is Ron Weasley. “He’s modeled on my old friend, Sean, a schoolmate, still a kind of surrogate brother today,” Rowling says softly. “For some reason I’ve spent most of my life in very close groups of three. I think there’s great fear in a child’s life — even the happiest child’s life — and the books show how children can overcome those fears. But I myself, as a young outsider, was lucky to have two wonderful male chums. I have the happiest, happiest memories of us together.”

Fantastically literate

If Harry is becoming a household word today, translated into 28 languages, with 8.2 million copies of the books in print in the United States alone, he’s headed for even bigger fame onscreen. Rowling has an author’s dream clause — final script approval! — for the Warner Bros. film in the making of “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.” With its flying cars, terrifying beasts, heart-stopping games of Quidditch (a mad variation of polo on broomsticks) and magical transformations, this first 1997 Potter book has all the makings of a Spielbergian blockbuster.

And yet the most miraculous feature of the books is that they are so unmistakably books — good, literate books, no goosebumpish pandering. The imaginative range is vast. The wit is dry (wizard gardens must be forcibly ” de-gnomed”), the satire sharp. There’s sheer Jabberwockian joy in language as character is proclaimed through such names as Snape, Filch, Voldemort and Peeves (the annoying poltergeist). Like “The Wind in the Willows” — one of the few familiar children’s classics that Rowling loves — Potter makes wonderful reading for adults for the same reason it’s catnip to kids: It gives them credit for having minds.

And running under all the colorful action is a clear spiritual message, exemplified in the fearless sacrifice Harry’s mother made for her son before the first book begins.

So it’s not surprising that a wince of pain flickers across the author’s face when she’s asked about the school boards — in four states, including South Carolina — that have not accepted the Potter series on account of its alleged sympathy with witchcraft and the occult.

“They don’t get it,” Rowling, a member of the Church of Scotland (Presbyterian), says wearily. “They have a perfect right to control what their own children read but not what other people’s children read — that’s a basic censorship issue. Look: I don’t believe in witchcraft. Many of the terms for spells and charms and so on, I invented. Witchcraft is just a metaphor for this other world of possibilities, beyond convention, that the mind can reach.”

Rowling, who has planned four more Potter books and will release another next summer, is being described in news accounts as one of the wealthiest women in the world. The first flush of success rattled her life.

“The publicity hit as I was finishing the second book — suddenly, for the first time in my entire life, I was in a panic, unable to write. Mentally constipated. Typical of me, really: Something wonderful happens and I’m the last to really believe it.

“It’s odd,” Rowling continues, “how, as more people love the books, they feel entitled to interfere. One adult told me, ‘You mustn’t kill off this character.’ Finally I told myself, ‘It’s no good thinking what anyone else wants, just follow your unconscious and write what you want.’ And the writing flowed again.”

And will there be a sea change in lifestyle?

“We’re moving to a new apartment, 10 minutes up the street in Edinburgh,” Rowling says with her — some might say mysterious — smile. “Jessica only has a tiny garden to play in and she needs a bigger one.”

consulte Mais informação