Categoria: 2004

Entrevista com David Heyman, Steve Kloves, Mark Radcliffe, Alfonso Cuaron, e Jo Rowling

Tradução: BLiNd [TheusPotter]
Revisão:

Interview with David Heyman, Steve Kloves, Mark Radcliffe, Alfonso Cuaron, and Jo Rowling,
Prisoner of Azkaban DVD “Extra,” November 23, 2004

David Heyman: The books lead us. I mean, we’re in a good position of having Jo Rowling provide us with fantastic sorts of material.

Steve Kloves: All you have to do is read the book to kind of, I think, sense the place. It’s, you know, tone and atmosphere — which I thought she’d done, and continues to do, so grand.

David Heyman: In the very first one, Jo came to the set when we were designing, coming up with the design, and had a look-through of them to make sure we weren’t wildly off.

Mark Radcliffe: Jo created this world, we wanted to stay true to it and organic to it, and that’s been our mission.

David Heyman: All that vision is born very much from the book. Part of the universe that first Chris, and now Alfonso, has built upon.

Alfonso Cuaron: From the get-go what I was aiming at was serving the material.

Jo Rowling: Out of the five books I’ve published, writing Azkaban was the easiest, and in some ways I think that shows. Although it’s the tricky part in some was, as Alfonso will really appreciate, and Steve Kloves, as the script writer, will really appreciate, because they’ve kind of had to negotiate the same ascent that I had to negotiate. At the same time, I felt I was really given space to do that, so I — so it was an enjoyable process.

Alfonso Cuaron: The moment that I read the book I-I just felt so connected. I … for me, everything was so clear how it should look as a film, and how it should be told as a film.

Steve Kloves: We tried to discover the best way to convey what Jo was expressing in the page, in movie terms. And um, that lead us to some interesting places.

Alfonso Cuaron: You deal with so many abstract concepts, like the time traveling. It is so … such an abstract thing, and it is so difficult, that even trying to explain it right now….

Jo Rowling: Yeah, it’s hard.

Alfonso Cuaron: …is hard.

Jo Rowling: It is hard, ‘cause you just go in circles.

Alfonso Cuaron: But then in the book, everything just makes perfect sense.

Jo Rowling: I loved watching that part of the film, I loved watching the time turner sequence. There was just enough humor in it, just enough nearness is … Dumbledore’s comment when they come back is just perfect.

David Heyman: When we got to Scotland to meet with Jo — one, I think it’s important for Jo to feel comfortable and two, I think that jo is a wonderful source of information and is incredibly generous with us.

Chris Columbus: I remember when she walked in the door, for some reason I expected to meet someone who was like seventy. Jo walked in, she was younger than I was, we liked the same films and we liked the same music, and it was just an immediate connection.

David Heyman: When she met Alfonso, he talked about his vision for the film, talked through many ideas.

Jo Rowling: Alfonso was mentioned very early on, and I was really enthusiastic about the idea — and I loved “Y Tu Mama Tambien.” Alfonso just obviously understands teenage boys backwards and everything, at 13 now.

Alfonso Cuaron: these kids were starting to take themselves seriously as actors, so they were willing to explore more emotional territories. I was so lucky that I had them so raw and so willing to go there.

Jo Rowling: I think all three of them give their best performance to date.

Alfonso Cuaron: Poor Malfoy….

Jo Rowling: He deserves it, though.

Alfonso Cuaron: ..he deserves it.

Jo Rowling: Tom took that punch really well.

Alfonso Cuaron: He, oh….

Jo Rowling: He really did a good job on that.

Alfonso Cuaron: Oh, they loved it. Emma was looking forward for that moment, and I remember Tom telling Emma, “Oh if you want to hit me, just hit me, just hit me.”

Jo Rowling: What a hero.

Alfonso Cuaron: The universe that you created … you know every corner of that place.

Stuart Craig: This was a map of the world. This drawing is Jo Rowling’s drawing, that she executed in just a few minutes. As you see, it has all the principle ingredients. The Dark Forest is here, the Whomping Willow, the Quidditch Pitch, Hogwarts Castle itself. The Black Lake is there, the perimeter road, Hogsmeade Village. She had a very, very exact and precise understanding of her world and her creation. She knew exactly the relationship between all of the elements, she was able to give it to us – and that became our Bible.

Alfonso Cuaron: We needed a place where the kids could see the execution of Buckbeak, and we thought about having a graveyard. And we consulted Jo about it and she said “No, the graveyard is not there,” and I said “Why?” And then she gave me the whole explanation of why the graveyard cannot b there, because it’s in a different place of the castle. Because it’s going to play…and she knows her thing, she knows exactly what’s going to happen later. And once I remember having little people in some storyboards, playing some keyboards and an organ in the Great Hall. And Jo said “No, there are no little people in this universe.” I said “Yes, it’s like…” she says, “Yes, lovely image, but they don’t make sense in this universe.”

Jo Rowling: I was really mean; I wouldn’t let him do it. That’s not fair, is it?

Alfonso Cuaron: She was just about trying as much as possible to serve the story and the spirit of the story, because that’s what is great of the book. Because the third book is, for me, so abstract and deals with so many abstract concepts – but at the same time, it’s in the frame of an adventure.

David Heyman: I think it’s very, very important that Alfonso Cuaron be allowed to make this his own film. It’s important that any director come into a situation like this and feel the freedom, feel empowered to make it their own, that’s how you’re going to get the best films.

Alfonso Cuaron: Pretty much all the decisions, all the visual decisions, were made as we were shooting and not in the cutting room. We made most of those decisions either in the storyboard or while we were blocking the scenes with the actors, working with the actors, and we decided how to approach the scene.

David Heyman: What he’s done is he’s built from the foundations of the books, built from the foundations of Chris Columbus, who captured the first two, but made them very much his own to serve the story.

Jo Rowling: Alfonso had good intuition about what would and wouldn’t work. He’s put things in the film that, without knowing it, foreshadow things that are going to happen in the final two books. So I really got goosebumps when I saw a couple of those things, and I thought people are going to look back on the film and think those were put in deliberately as clues.

Steve Kloves: Jo wants the movies to be faithful to the books, on the other hand, she realizes that they’re completely different mediums. To be entirely faithful, these movies would be sixteen hours long.

Alfonso Cuaron: In this film, the film was about a child trying to find his identity as a teenager. We found the theme, and then whatever stuck there we kept, and whatever didn’t … sorry. As long as we didn’t affect or contradict either the universe, or what is to come.

Chris Columbus: My biggest concern for the visual effects, I want to make absolutely certain that the visual effects would again move up a notch from the last film. First film, we were fairly rushed and the effects were never up to anyone’s standards. In the second film, we improved them greatly, and I wanted to take another leap in this film.

Alfonso Cuaron: We’re watching it and it’s like “Wow, that hippogriff, he looks great.” And we’re just praising the conceptual artists and the CG artists that put it together, then someone said “Yes, but don’t forget who imagined it in the first place.” And here she is.

Jo Rowling: I think it’s important to say I didn’t invent the hippogriff. I invented that hippogriff, but the creature the hippogriff, as you know, is in folklore and mythology, so that’s not my creation. But I really thought hard about this, because it could’ve been, in the book, it could’ve ben an absurdity. And indeed, it really could’ve been in the film as well, but I thought you made him a real creature.

Alfonso Cuaron: There are not that many graphical representations of hippogriff, and that is something with the story that is very interesting. There are sphinx, there are several sphinx, or you see creatures that are half bird and half cat, a lot of different things. But for hippogriff, it was actually hard to find….

Jo Rowling: I knew that ‘cause I went looking.

Alfonso Cuaron: You knew that, yeah.

Jo Rowling: I could hardly find any anywhere.

Alfonso Cuaron: No, I know.

Jo Rowling: So I thought it’s complete liberty to invent. I had a nightmare in my teens, in which I saw hooded, gliding figures. They could almost be figments of your imagination in a sort of tortured imagination, as indeed they are. But you know what I mean? They could be figments of a mentally ill mind. And um, that was the thing that I was expecting in the book. Harry’s particularly vulnerable to them, but he’s got a much worse post, so he would be. You know it’s not weakness, it’s just the fact that he’s faced more.

Chris Columbus: I think Alfonso came up with an amazing design for the dementors, because they truly are unlike anything you’ve ever seen. They are sort of a close cousin to maybe what we’ve all perceived as death over the years, and that’s very, very frightening.

Jo Rowling: I thought the shrunken head was very funny, I really liked that. It was all done really well, and it was a really funny idea. I mean, I’ve said to Steve Kloves many times “Dammit, I wish I could’ve written them up.” You know? But obviously that’s what you want. You want to be working with people who come up with great stuff, it’s great you know, when I’m looking around for all these little bits that are completely consistent with the world. But I, you know, there you go.

Chris Columbus: For me, one of the great memories was sitting in a room with Steve Kloves, Jo Rowling, and David Heyman, the producer. Just the four of us for several weeks discussing quidditch, talking about what it’s going to look like. That excitement, that sense of making something really special, was something I took with me through the making of the first film and the second film.

Steve Kloves: The overall process is incredibly open, and incredibly creative.

Jo Rowling: I think in this case, the book and the director were really made for each other. There’s a unity about the film, there’s a consistency..its tone, its feeling, that’s very, very enjoyable for me – and that’s not a very easy thing, for the author of the original material. I’m completely happy, what more can I say?

Leia mais

O novo filme Potter esgueira-se em spoilers para os próximos livros.

Tradução: Naty Granger
Revisão: {patylda}

Puig, Claudia. “New ‘Potter’ movie sneaks in spoilers for upcoming books,” USA Today, 27 May, 2004

It is almost as eerie as one of the plots from her beloved best-selling books. Harry Potterscribe J.K. Rowling says the new director, Alfonso Cuarón, has a “good intuition.”

Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling says that Alfonso Cuaron, who directed The Prisoner of Azkaban, which opens next Friday, inadvertently foreshadowed events that will happen in books six and seven, which she has yet to complete.

The last book published was the fifth book in the series, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. The first two movies based on the Potter books were blockbusters.

“I really got goose bumps when I saw a couple of those things, and I thought, people are going to look back on the film and think that those were put in deliberately as clues,” Rowling says in an interview released by Warner Bros., which is distributing the movie.

Cuaron, for his part, says “in a way, it was intuition, but everything is so emotionally eloquent, the book gives you all the hints.”

Rowling cites Cuaron’s “good intuition about what would and wouldn’t work” in his film version, which is a less by-the-book take on her novel than the previous two films. It’s also shorter.

She particularly was impressed by his vision of the otherworldly prison guards, the dementors.

“They are just as frightening as I imagined, just superb,” she says. “One of the biggest themes in the book is Harry’s conquering the dementors. And the dementors for me were about depression, and not just sadness. I think Alfonso’s really done a great job on that, in showing what that can feel like and the circumstance in which you become vulnerable to that.”

Rowling said the process of creating the third book was “the best writing experience I ever had. Of the five books that are published, writing Azkaban was the easiest, and in some ways I think it shows. I was in a very comfortable place when I wrote (number) three: Immediate financial worries were over, and press attention wasn’t yet by any means excessive.”

Rowling said she was immediately intrigued by the idea of Cuaron directing the third movie. She had “really, really loved (Cuaron’s most recent film) Y Tu Mamá También. Alfonso just obviously understands teenage boys, and you know my characters are 13 now. … This is the book where Harry literally learns how to take care of himself. He finds his father, as it were, and he finds two father substitutes, but the one who actually saves his life is himself.”

Rowling says she was drawn by Cuaron’s ability to make a film out of classic children’s novels. “I’d seen A Little Princess, which I thought was an excellent adaptation, not a very literal adaptation, but very faithful to the emotional truth of the story.”

Similarly, she sees the movie as “Alfonso’s version of my world. It’s his baby. For the very obvious reason that books and films are such different media, to do a very literal adaptation maybe wouldn’t serve the material best, and I think he’s done exactly what I hoped he would do. He’s put a lot of humor in there, and I think it’s fantastic. I’d be very, very surprised if most people didn’t find their favorite parts of the book in that film.”

Leia mais

Casa de Segredos da Rowling

Tradução: Rö. Granger
Revisão: Adriana Snape

MacDonald, Toby. “Rowling’s house of secrets,” Scotland on Sunday, 21 March 2004

THE Harry Potter phenomenon has become a worldwide byword for rags-to-riches success.

But are JK Rowling’s millions of book sales and hundreds of millions of pounds in the bank due to the generosity of a humble office clerk?

The relationship between Rowling and her Edinburgh friend Fiona Wilson – who met while the author was a struggling single mother – has been well charted.

And when the creator of Harry Potter rose to fame and fortune, she gave Wilson, who helped her during some of her darkest moments, one of her former homes to mark their friendship. But the real reason behind Rowling’s astonishing generosity – the flat is now worth £200,000 – may now have been revealed.

Rowling, in a radio interview to be broadcast today, says she was only able to get her literary career under way after a mystery benefactor loaned her £4,000. The money allowed Rowling to get private childcare so she could study for a new job.

It also allowed her the freedom to write her first novel – Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone – which became a runaway bestseller and the launch pad for one of the most remarkable writing careers in literary history.

Rowling refuses to identify her benefactor, but the revelation that the author received financial help at a key point in her career could go a long way to explaining why she later gifted Wilson a flat. In the radio interview, Rowling reveals she broke down and cried at the extent of her friend’s financial gesture, which she says rescued her from the “scrapheap”.

The episode occurred when Rowling, now 37, was living on benefits in a rundown flat in Edinburgh after leaving her first husband. She had won a place to become a student teacher but could not afford childcare for her daughter, Jessica. Then, at her lowest point, the friend gave her a £4,000 loan to carry on studying.

With just £70-a-week income, Rowling believed she could never afford to pay back the money, but the gift was to change her life, allowing her to graduate and teach part-time as she wrote the first Harry Potter novel.

Rowling, the world’s richest female author, is now worth more than £500m and is a patron of the National Council for One Parent Families.

Office clerk Wilson, now 42, was also a struggling single mother when she and Rowling lived in neighbouring streets in Leith almost 10 years ago.

In the interview, Rowling talks emotionally of her gratitude when her friend extended her the financial lifeline.

“I broke down and cried when my friend offered it to me,” she says. “At the time it was like half a million pounds to me. It was this enormous sum of money. I think we both thought I would never be able to pay it back. The friend was saying, in effect: ‘Here is a gift to help you.’”

‘I broke down and cried when my friend offered it [the money] to me’

Rowling said that she was in desperate straits when she arrived in Edinburgh with daughter Jessica after leaving her Portuguese husband.

“I was living on virtually nothing. Income support in those days was just under £70 a week. I was getting full housing benefit so my rent was being paid, but out of that £70 obviously came everything – clothing, food, utilities – and then I was looking at buying the textbooks and all the equipment you need to study.

“I had been teaching abroad and wanted to qualify for teaching over here. I very much felt that I was on the scrapheap and I desperately wanted to work.”

Rowling confesses that the first time she had to go into a post office to pick up her benefits she felt “everyone knew why I was there. It was as if I was in a clinic for some horrible illness”.

She qualified for a Post Graduate Certificate in Education (PGCE), but then found her way barred.

“I had been misinformed that there was a crèche at the place I was going to study, but it turned out to have been closed down two years previously. So, having achieved a place on the course I had literally 24 hours’ celebration before I realised I could not do the course because I had no childcare available to me.

“State childcare simply does not give you the hours you need to study full-time or work full-time. Private childcare was prohibitively expensive – I couldn’t dream of it.”

The loan, however, meant she was able to pay for childcare and continue with her course. But she says it was not without its heartache.

Rowling, interviewed by Libby Purves for The Learning Curve, to be broadcast on Radio Four at 11pm, said: “I found it a terrible wrench to leave my daughter – up until then we had been together 24 hours a day, and then suddenly we were separated for the vast majority of the day.

“I found that very difficult. But I did believe it was an investment in her future, so that’s really what made me strong enough to do it.”

She carried on with a punishing schedule: studying by day, looking after Jessica in the evening, then writing Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone through the night.

“I can remember being so tired I would fall asleep on buses. I was writing at the same time as doing the PGCE. It tipped me over the edge and took me into zombie territory.”

Once she had graduated, Rowling worked on supply for a year, teaching French. After her first book was published she received a £6,000 grant from the Scottish Arts Council to complete the second Potter novel, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.

With the advance from that, she bought a two-bedroom flat in Edinburgh for £40,000.

In August 2001, Rowling, with royalties flooding in and after just selling the film rights to her first two books, gifted the flat in the Merchiston area of Edinburgh to Wilson, a financial clerk.

She has a daughter the same age as Rowling’s and is said to have been born in India, but lived mainly in Glasgow and Edinburgh.

Rowling’s publicist at Colman Getty said the author had no intention of identifying the benefactor and added that the gift to Wilson was “a personal thing”.

When she was approached at her home, Wilson declined to comment.

Leia mais

Harry atinge a adolescência

Puig, Claudia. “Harry atinge a adolescência”. USA TODAY, 19 de março de 2004. Hertfordshire, Inglaterra – Hermione começa a usar jeans e – ugh – andar de mãos dadas com Rony. Harry é um bruxo de 13 anos de idade...

Leia mais

Entrevistas JKR – Ano – 2004

O que aconteceu em 2004? Em maio de 2004, Rowling lançou uma nova versão de seu website, e começou a usá-lo para se comunicar (informar, provocar, repreender, confundir, entreter) com sua crescente base de fãs. As entrevistas e...

Leia mais
Carregando