Categoria: Biografia

Seu momento mágico

Tradução: Ronnie
Revisão: {patylda}
*OK Categorias e Conteúdo

Newsweek, 30 June 2003.

J.K. Rowling has this thing she does where her head dips down an inch or two into her shoulders and her hands twist the air in front of her, as if she’s wringing agony out of the air itself. And that’s what she does when you ask her what she thinks of her new book, “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.” “At the moment I’m at the stage when you can only see faults,” she says, her hands going in time with her voice. “I rang my sister and said, ‘The book’s dreadful, it’s just dreadful.’ She just laughed. I said, ‘This is not funny. It is not funny that the book’s dreadful.’ And she said, ‘You’ve said this on every single book.’ I said, ‘But this time I really, really mean it. It’s just dreadful.’ And she said, ‘Yep, you said that on every single book.’ So she was no help at all.” Not to pick a fight in the first paragraph or anything, but we’re with the sister all the way on this.
On the other hand, who wouldn’t second-guess themselves if their four previous novels about the world’s most famous boy wizard had sold more than 190 million copies worldwide in eight years and been translated into 55 languages? The last installment in the saga, “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire,” sold 3 million copies the first weekend it was released in 2000, making it the fastest-selling book in history. The only book that stands a good chance of beating the record is “The Order of the Phoenix.” Amazon.com had more than a million pre-orders, and between midnight last Friday, when the book went on sale, and Monday, Barnes & Noble expected to sell a mil- lion copies.

When books did go on sale at 12:01 a.m. Saturday, bookstores reopened to thousands of costumed Harrys or just kids in pajamas who couldn’t wait an extra minute for their books. These scenes in bookstores were reminiscent of the midnight-madness sales for “Goblet of Fire” in 2000, but many of this year’s celebrations were much more elaborate. The Magic Tree Bookstore in Oak Park, Ill., talked the town into transforming an entire commercial block into the wizard street of Diagon Alley. Thousands of people turned out, including Bonnie and Vann Smith and their daughter, Bridget, 14, who came all the way from Mountain Home, Ark. Bridget said she’s read each of the four previous novels 11 times, and planned to read the new book to her parents on the drive home – “if I don’t finish it tonight.” In New York’s Times Square, people lined up around the block at Toys “R” Us to get a book, including Courtney Sadowsky, 28, of Howell, N.J., who said, “I already read the first Harry Potter book to my infant daughter of 7 months.” She plans to do the same with the rest of the series. Standing in a line around the block to buy a book at 2 a.m. is not everyone’s idea of quality time. Let’s hear it for Miami’s Books & Books: if you reserved a book, it promised doorstep delivery by dawn Saturday.

The week before “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix” went on sale was, if anything, even more frenzied. Bowing to Rowling’s wishes, her British and American publishers did their best to keep the book locked up until the sale date, so that not one child, and certainly not one critic, got hold of a copy ahead of anyone else. The immediate beneficiaries of this policy were English bookies, who ran odds on which character would die in the new book, with Hagrid the gamekeeper the favorite at 7-2, followed by Sirius Black at 4-1 and Professors McGonagall and Dumbledore at 5-1. All week long, lucky shoppers kept finding books that had mysteriously landed on store shelves – in a Wal-Mart in Canada, in a health-food store in Brooklyn. (Ours came from a public library.) Scholastic, which spent more than $US3 million promoting the new book, was so adamant about not revealing the contents to anyone before the debut date that the National Braille Press said it couldn’t get access to the manuscript to produce a Braille version before the weekend. Very few authors get that kind of support from their publishers. But with all of publishing in the doldrums for two years (even Scholastic laid off 4 percent of its staff recently), which publisher wouldn’t jump to accommodate the creator of “Harry Potter”?

Not that Rowling is a prima donna. She doesn’t even like to complain. Her life, she wants you to know, is well beyond OK: “Only someone whose been as broke as I was could appreciate how happy I am. I appreciate every day not having to worry about money.” The 37-year-old author’s got a new husband, Dr. Neil Murray, a general practitioner whom she met through mutual friends and married the day after Christmas in 2001. They have a new baby, David Gor – don Rowling Murray, born in March. And she’s going to guest-star on “The Simpsons” next fall. Three years ago the Queen of England made Rowling an Officer of the Order of the British Empire. (And as long as we’re talking about the queen, Rowling is reportedly the richer of the two, although she denies that’s she’s worth anywhere near the rumored $US468 million.) When she gave NEWSWEEK a rare interview at her home in Edinburgh (there’s another house in the Scottish countryside and another in London), she acted like a celebrity only once: she kept us waiting. But that was so she could feed the baby and put him down for a nap.

The happy-ending address of the real-life Cinderella – the single mother who nine years ago was scribbling away in Edinburgh coffee shops while her baby daughter slept – is a rambling two-story Victorian stone house with some faded hydrangeas beside the front stoop. It sits in a tree-lined upper-middle-class neighborhood full of doctors and lawyers and politicians, and it’s not, Rowling points out, in the poshest part of town. There’s a freestanding office on the property where two assistants handle the thousand pieces of mail she gets a week. Rowling herself spends at least one day a week answering letters. There are no fancy cars in the drive, unless you count her husband’s Mini Cooper (oddest piece of Rowling trivia: she doesn’t know how to drive). Her daughter, Jessica, from her first marriage, still attends a public school. The only piece of evidence that you’re anywhere near rich-and-famous territory is the lock on the gate. Butch, the resident Jack Russell terrier, is much too friendly to frighten intruders.

When Rowling does get David down for his nap and comes strolling across the gravel drive to the office, she seems tall and gangly in jeans and a red shirt and not shy so much as preoccupied. But when she sits down and begins to talk, she crafts every answer with a true storyteller’s knack for detail and narrative.

Right off, you can’t help asking if fame doesn’t have its price – doesn’t it get harder and harder just to go for a walk? “No, no,” she replies, slowly and evenly. “I can honestly say there is nowhere I would avoid.” But then her hands start doing that twisting thing on the table. “Well, that’s not true. There is one thing I would avoid: I no longer write in cafes, I can’t do that anymore. And I know people might think, ‘Well, very small price to pay.’ But to me it’s a real privation, because it was the way I worked best. Very occasionally, as a treat, I take my notebook and go off to places that I’m not known to write in, and I write there. Last year I thought I’d been very clever: I went to the National Portrait Gallery’s cafe. I thought, ‘Well, no one will care, obviously, because they’ll all be interested in what they’ve just seen.’ Two days later the Edinburgh Evening News printed, ‘J. K. Rowling spotted in the National Portrait Gallery Cafe writing away. Is this Book 5?” Yes, it was Book 5, but now I can’t write there, you bastards.” That concludes the complaining portion of the interview.

Rowling’s first four books came out one right after another with hardly a year apart. By the time the fourth appeared, the strain of the pace was beginning to show. “Goblet of Fire” was compulsively readable, like a 734-page action sequence, but the writing was much sloppier than the prose in the earlier installments. “Order of the Phoenix,” in contrast, never goes out of control. She tells her story with her characteristic gift for pacing and surprise. Everything we’ve taken for granted – starting with the absolute power of Dumbledore, Harry’s headmaster at Hogwarts – is called into question. And that makes things much more frightening, both for Harry and for the reader, as evil Lord Voldemort consolidates his power, infecting even the Ministry of Magic with his malign designs.

“Phoenix” is the most atmospheric of all the Potter books. And since it seems that Edinburgh has a castle on every corner, you wonder how much Rowling has drawn on her surroundings. Not in the slightest, she claims. “I could live anywhere and produce it word for word the same. But I do think being British is very important. Because we do have a motley, mongrel folklore here, and I was interested in it and collected it. And then got the idea for Harry.”

Rowling makes no apology for having kept her readers waiting. “I wanted to know what it was like to write without having the pressure of the deadline. And it was wonderful. I had been writing very intensely, since ‘Philosopher’s Stone’ [the first book]. By ‘Goblet,’ I was writing 10 hours a day. And that’s just getting stupid. Because I have a daughter. I really wanted to see her before she turned 18 and left home and never spoke to me.” The extra time paid off in a very long, but never windy, chronicle where every page produces examples of Rowling’s astonishing inventiveness. Best new touch? A quill pen that Harry is forced to use in detention. As he writes “I must not tell lies,” the words are carved into the back of his hand. “Phoenix” is one of the best books in the series. How good is it? I peeked ahead to find out how it ended. So sue me. I peeked ahead in “Bleak House,” too. Only a really good book can make you do that.

Yes, a major character dies, but no giving away the ending here. In place of a spoiler, let’s pause for a message from the author: “I know that a certain number of my fans are going to be pretty upset with me by the end of the book. I really apologize to them. But it had to be so. And I am sorry because I know what it’s like to lose someone, albeit a fictional person, that you were quite attached to.” And yes, the plot gets darker in “Phoenix,” a point Rowling thinks is so obvious by now it’s hardly worth mentioning. “I’m surprised that people are surprised that the series is getting darker, because the first book started with a murder. And although you didn’t see the murder happen, that for me was an announcement that these things would continue within the series.” But she’s not blind to the fact that very young children will want to read these books, and that they will be disturbed: “I was always ambivalent when people told me that they’d read the first book to their 6-year-old, because I knew what was coming. And I have to say even with the first book, that is a scary ending.”

Perhaps the biggest surprise in “Phoenix” is that Harry, now 15, is finally acting like a moody, misunderstood teenager. “I’ve said all along that I want Harry to grow up in a realistic way, which means hormonal impulses, and it means a whole bunch of adolescent angst and anger, actually. Harry’s a lot more angry in Book 5, which I think is entirely right, given what he’s been through. It’s about time he got angry about how life has dealt him.” But isn’t it inappropriate for a 9-year-old to read about those things? “I don’t think so. They will be 14 themselves. There is no harm in them knowing what 14-year-olds may sometimes feel like. My daughter is 9, and I know that she can cope with Book 5 because I’m reading it to her at the moment. She’s coping.” She’s also, to her mother’s mild dismay, begun dictating plot points. “She’s told me unequivocally who I’m not to kill. And I’ve said, ‘Well, I already know who’s going to die, so now is not the time to come to me and tell me I mustn’t kill X, Y and Zed, because their fates are now preordained.’ And she doesn’t like hearing that at all. Not at all.”

Few authors are so passionately protective of their creations as Rowling, so it’s fun to listen to her put a subtle but very diplomatic distance between her work and the two movies derived from it so far. She likes the looks of the movies: “Chris Columbus [director of the first two films] was eager for me to tell him exactly what I saw in terms of sets particularly. And when I walked into the Great Hall of Hogwarts where they’d built it on a studio set outside London, that was absolutely like walking into the inside of my own head.” She was crazy about the scenes of Quidditch: “Quidditch really lived up to my expectations. That was phenomenal.” And she’s wild about Alfonso Cuaron, who’s directing the third movie, “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban.” Rowling points out that one of the reasons she sold film rights to Warner Bros. was that they’d done such a good job with “The Little Princess,” a Cuaron film. But that, she implies, is quite enough gushing for one day, because the next thing she says is, “Obviously, I prefer books. I’m a writer. That’s always going to be so. The thing about film is that everyone sees the – same thing, and that’s what will always make it substandard to the novel. Readers have to work with me to create a new Hogwarts every single time every book is read.”

When it comes to the merchandising of Harry Potter, however – the action figures, robes and vibrating broomsticks – Rowling makes it plain that she never set out to write “Harry Potter and the Chamber of Commerce.” There have been moments, she admits, “where I regretted selling film rights. Just moments.” While Warner Bros. has given her a lot of say in the way the stories are developed for film, “the one thing that I did not have the power to do was say no to merchandising. And I would have done if I could have. But you have to be realistic about this. These are very, very expensive films to make. And no film company in the world is going to make them faithfully to the books and not merchandise because they’ve got to get their money back somehow.”

Of course, it’s tough to imagine anyone in the Potter universe not making his money back. When you ask her to explain the popularity of her books, she wisely says she has no clue and advises you to go ask her readers. But she certainly knows who she is and what she wants from life. Toward the end of the interview, her face takes on that preoccupied look again, and her answers dwindle down to yeses and nos. But then her husband brings the baby over to the office for a visit, and she lights right up. Watching her cuddle her newborn, you remember what she’d said when asked if there were any parallels between having a baby and producing a book. “Yes, there are parallels,” she replied. “The difference is that I just look at David and think that he’s absolutely perfect, whereas you look at the finished book and you think, ‘Oh, damn it, I should have changed that.’ You’re never happy. Whereas with a baby, you’re happy. If you’ve got a perfect baby, you’re just grateful.” Those of us under Harry Potter’s magic spell are more reluctant to criticize Rowling’s literary creation. But we know all about being grateful.

With Jac Chebatoris, Nayelli Gonzalez and Andrew Phillips in New York and Karen Springen in Chicago

©2003 Newsweek, Inc.

Leia mais

Eu não estou escrevendo por dinheiro: é por mim e por lealdade aos fãs

Tradução: Naty Granger
Revisão:
*OK Categorias e Conteúdo

Treneman, Ann. “I’m not writing for the money: It’s for me and out of loyalty to fans,” The Times (London), June 20, 2003

At one minute past midnight, the fifth Harry Potter book will hit the bookshops. In an exclusive interview, J. K. Rowling tells Ann Treneman how she has finally come to terms with celebrity, and how marriage and her children have made her happier than she has ever been.

JOANNE KATHLEEN ROWLING is a happy woman these days, and it shows. She greets me at the top of the staircase at her home, babe in arms. His name is David and he is round and soft and cooing. We all go into the front room and there, on the shelf, is the other baby in her life: a 1kg doorstop that is the fifth book in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.

“It is big. Very big,” she says. “I didn’t dare do a word count.”

So how big is big? After all, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, the fourth book, was 636 pages.

Joanne peeks at the last page. “It is 766 pages. When I finished it, I thought, Oh my God it’s bigger than Goblet. I knew already it was but I thought, well maybe it’s slightly bigger and then I spoke to my editor at Bloomsbury and she said, ‘You know how long it is, obviously?’ And I said, no, I don’t actually. And it was a quarter of a million words.” Her voice goes almost to a whisper. “I nearly died.”

Don’t you have an editor who cuts things, I ask rather abruptly.

She laughs and takes on an actor’s voice: “Don’t you have an editor? Does anyone ever try to stop you!” She reverts to her normal voice. “Yeah. Of course they do. But they truly felt that the information contained in the book was necessary.”

This is the third time I have interviewed J.K. Rowling. The first was in 1997, after the publication of the first book, Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. She was a rising star with no idea of the galaxy into which she and Harry would soon soar. “I never dreamt this would happen,” she said then, when sales reached 30,000. “My realistic side had allowed myself to think that I might get one good review. That was my idea of a peak. So everything else really has been like stepping into Wonderland for me.”

Wonderland indeed. Three years later, in May 2000, we met in an Edinburgh hotel room. She had just finished Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire and was quick and funny and nervous, smoking five Marlboro Lights in two hours and talking like a machine-gun at full rattle. At that time she had sold 30 million copies, a film was coming out and merchandising deals were brewing. Her wealth was estimated at £15 million but her life, which revolved around her daughter and writing and friends, had none of the gloss that money can bring.

Fast forward three years. Rowling has now sold almost 200 million books and is worth an estimated £280 million. She is wealthier than the Queen and is listed as the 122nd richest person (and the ninth richest woman) in Britain. Some people would revel in these facts, flashing them about like a diamond in sunlight. I doubted Rowling would: the last time we met she .denied she was famous and said her only major purchase had been an aquamarine ring that she called her “No One Is Grinding Me Down” ring.

I was curious to meet her again and see how she had changed. It is true that I had not seen Joanne showing off her lovely dining table in the pages of Hello! magazine or anything like that, but you never know: money and fame can corrupt as much as power. Facts are few. She is 37 now and married Dr Neil Murray, an anaesthetist, 18 months ago. Jessica, her daughter from an earlier marriage, is almost 10, and David was born in March. The family has houses in Edinburgh, Perthshire and London.

Her main home is in Edinburgh and that is where we meet. For some reason I had decided that she might be a minimalist – a hangover, or so my logic went, from the days of poverty. Wrong. Her home is vibrant with colour and patterns, and the front room busy with books and photographs. It is not a showcase but a lived-in family home. Apparently there is a dog somewhere in the house. Certainly there is a baby in the room who provides a gurgling backing track for the interview.

J.K. Rowling looks terrific. She gave up smoking three years ago and, as she is breastfeeding, has even had to forego the Nicorette. She explains this as she reaches for a pack of Wrigley’s and advises me to buy shares in the company. The interview, as events tend to be when tiny babies are involved, is the result of meticulous planning. She spent all weekend wondering how she was going to get the baby fed and changed and herself presentable “with all my buttons done up properly” at the correct time.

It takes one minute to see that she has changed. Definitely. She is more relaxed, her edges rounded off. The machine gun has been replaced by a lower and softer voice, though her chuckle-laugh is the same. I say that she seems different, calmer.

“I’m loads calmer. Yes. Loads. I think I’m loads happier now, which would make me calmer.”

Well, I say, you weren’t the last time we met.

“But you saw me probably during the worst time. The last time you interviewed me was not a happy time. Writing Book Four was an absolute nightmare. I literally lost the plot halfway through. My own deadline was totally unrealistic. That was my fault because I didn’t tell anyone. I just ploughed on, as I tend to do in life, and then I realised I had really got myself into hot water. I had to write like fury to make the deadline and it half killed me and I really was, oh, burnt out at the end of it. Really burnt out. And the idea of going straight into another Harry Potter book filled me with dread and horror. And that was the first time I had ever felt like that. I had been writing Harry for 10 years come 2000 and that was the first time I ever thought, Oh God, I don’t want to keep going.”

Rowling, who had the idea for the seven-book Harry Potter series on a delayed train to Manchester in 1990, had not taken a break since she began writing in earnest as a broke single mum. She wrote mostly in cafés then. When she finished one book she began the next immediately, sometimes on the same day. And so, fresh from producing Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, the fourth book, she felt immense pressure to start the next.

It was not the first time she had felt the strain of the deadlines. “The first thing that I did when I finished Prisoner of Azkaban was to discuss repaying the advance for the next book.” I look shocked at this. “Yes, you can imagine. People were a little bit shaken, I think. I said: I want to give the money back and then I will be free to finish in my own time rather than have to produce it for next year.”

And now, after Book Four, she again told her editor that she couldn’t make such a tight timescale for the next book. “Because I knew I couldn’t do it. Well, I probably could have done it. Because I do work hard. I COULD have done it, but the book would have been lousy and I would have then collapsed completely and said: That’s it, no more. I can’t do it any more. So, I said this to them.” Her publishers told her to produce the book at her own pace.

She had a break from Harry but kept on writing because, as she says, “I have to write”. She wouldn’t say much about what she was writing, except that it was “totally for me” and a story. Like a novel? “Yes,” she says. It is unfinished.

The break lasted the best part of a year. “I was also really conscious – and I didn’t need anyone to tell me this – that I needed to stop and I needed to try to come to terms with what had happened to me. I had to really try to cope with what had happened because I wasn’t coping. I wasn’t coping at all. For a long time people would say to me, ‘What is it like to be famous?’ and I would say ‘I am not famous’. Now this was patently untrue. It was the only way that I could cope with it, by being in so much denial that I was virtually blind at times.

“I always felt like I was racing to catch up with the situation. So I could cope now with the fact that I was being doorstepped but I couldn’t cope with the fact that they were now going after my private life. I was always several steps behind. I couldn’t grasp what had happened. And I don’t think many people could have done. The thing got so huge.”

She is always asked why Harry Potter has been so successful. “And I cannot answer that question. I can’t. It sounds coy. It sounds disingenuous. I never think of it like that. I think it would be dangerous for me to think about it like that, to sit down and analyse it, to decide why. It would be an exercise in navel gazing. It would also possibly lead me to deduce that I was doing certain things right and maybe certain things I should drop and if you start writing like that…”

From your head and not your heart, I say.

“Exactly. Then I think you are lost. And I would certainly be lost if I stopped enjoying it. And ultimately I need to do this. I mean, what is the point? I could have stopped writing four years ago and we would have been fine financially. So I’m not writing for the money. I could really do without the fame. The only point is to satisfy myself now and out of loyalty to the fans.” And Harry too, I say.

“Absolutely. When I say for me, it is for Harry … being true to what I know will be his end.”

How would you describe your feelings about fame?

“I never wanted it and I never expected it and certainly didn’t work for it and I see it as something that I have to get through, really. It does have nice aspects but for me, personally, probably the negative outweighs the positive. And we are talking here about being famous as opposed to having the money because the money has obviously relieved me of an enormous amount of worry and it has made my children secure in the sense that I do know they will have enough to eat and so on. And that is what the money means to me.”

Yes, I say, but you are way beyond that.

“Absolutely. It went way beyond that.”

Is it odd?

“Yes, it is very odd. And you feel guilty about it. A friend of mine said to me the other day, ‘But I would just go in a shop and I’d just say I will have one of those, one of those and one of those in every colour. Why don’t you do that?’ But the fact is that once you can do that, you don’t really want to do that. The amount of stuff you actually want to buy, when you can, shrinks a lot. Whereas when I was completely broke, I would have bought anything.”

So you wanted to acquire things, then?

“Yes. Because I couldn’t. I just couldn’t. I mean, a new tea towel, I could get quite excited about. You think I’m joking!”

What do you mean about feeling guilty?

“It just seems, well, this came to me through doing the thing that I love doing most. So I suppose I feel that I haven’t suffered enough pain for it.”

I say that is not how it works.

“I know. I know. We all know it doesn’t work like that. The world is completely screwed up. When David was born I had a company sending me free Babygros. I found it quite upsetting and I actually got quite tearful at one point. I remember Jessica, if someone had given me free Babygros then, that would have been a very big deal. That would have made my whole week. It is just very unfair, isn’t it?”

Rowling says she loves to write, has to write, happy or sad, but that it is far easier if she is happy. The new book has been written during the happiest period of her life. She had already started work on it before her marriage on Boxing Day, 2001. I say it must have been thrilling to meet someone new. “It was incredible. I always wanted to have more children and I had reached the point where I thought, OK, I’ve been so lucky. I’ve got the books. I’ve got Jessie. I cannot complain and then this has been just amazing.”

Is it true, I ask, that you meet someone when you aren’t looking for them?

“Yes. Definitely. I did not expect to meet anyone, actually. I thought the baggage was too much and it is a truism that when you do get famous, it’s not that I didn’t meet anyone, it’s that I didn’t meet anyone I wanted to have a relationship with, much less marry. Of course, you do meet people but it tends to be those who are very keen to approach you and maybe not those you would really want to meet.”

She says it is fortunate for both her and her husband that their careers are so divergent. “The night we met he told me he had read the first ten pages of Philosopher’s Stone on a late-night shift at the hospital and he thought it was quite good. And I thought that was fantastic. He hadn’t read the books. He didn’t really have a very clear idea of who I was. It meant that we could get to know each other in quite a normal way. I think he’s up to speed now, poor bloke. At the time he didn’t really have any idea about it all.”

She wrote most of the new book in Edinburgh and some in Perthshire. She no longer writes in cafés because people watch her and it makes her self-conscious. At home she writes all morning in her office, which is the size of single bedroom and the smallest room in the house, until she gets hungry, about 12.30pm usually. She breaks for a sandwich, then goes back to the computer until Jessie comes home from school (she has not had a nanny since becoming a two-parent family). They walk the dog, a Jack Russell. She makes tea. Neil comes home. Depending on how tired she is, she may write more in the evening.

One day a week is spent doing “charity stuff”. She has a charitable trust and is the patron of several groups, including one for single parents and the Multiple Sclerosis Society Scotland (her mother died of the disease in 1990 at the age of 45). I say that I believe she gives quite a lot of money away anonymously and she stares at the carpet, lips pressed.

Rowling became pregnant mid-book and knew she wanted to finish before the baby came. “I was getting bigger and bigger and bigger and then, just before Christmas, I realised I had finished the book and it was the most amazing thing. An incredible thing. It actually really took me by surprise. I was writing the last chapter, rewriting bits of it as you do, and then I wrote myself to the end of a paragraph and thought: Oh my God, I’ve finished the book! I couldn’t believe I’d done it.”

I make some comment about how long it is and she says: “It’s hysterical. They went in one day from saying, ‘She’s got writer’s block’ to saying, ‘She’s been self-indulgent’. And I thought, well, what a difference 24 hours makes.”

The “they” in that sentence is the press. She resents the idea that it has been reported that she had writer’s block almost as much as she resents the pressure of a deadline. She admits to being “too thin-skinned”. “But that is who I am and I couldn’t do the books if I weren’t who I am.” She was genuinely distressed by the accusations, levelled by the American writer Nancy Stouffer, that she was a plagiarist and she celebrated when a New York court ruled last year that she was innocent. She is fierce about protecting Jessica’s privacy, never using her in publicity or going with her to film premieres. She rarely talks about her, although, when I ask why she bought the London house, she laughs and says she had been staying at Claridge’s and “my daughter was getting a bit too used to room service”.

It is easy to forget, sitting in this warm and light-filled room, about the darker side of Potter mania. But it is out there. Some people are obsessed with the idea that her books are teaching children about evil and magic and believe Rowling is a witch of some kind. “I found death threats to myself on the net,” she says, describing how she was looking for something when she found herself on a Potter-hater site. “And then halfway through this message board I found, well, people being advised to shoot me, basically. Which was not a nice thing to find. It is bizarre.” She sighs. “But what can you do?”

“Fame is a very odd and very isolating experience,” she says. “And I know some people crave it. A lot of people crave it. I find that very hard to understand. Really. It is incredibly isolating and it puts a great strain on your relationships.” Most of her friends have been doorstepped and offered money by newspapers for their story and that makes Rowling feel guilty.

Her views on some journalists are embodied in Rita Skeeter, a character who, when last seen, had become a beetle and was trapped in a jar. “I have a fascination for Rita and I have grudging respect,” says Rowling. “She has the rhino hide that I would quite like to have but haven’t. And you’ve got to admire her tenacity and ingenuity. But I wouldn’t like to meet her.”

It is difficult to do an interview on a book that I have not been allowed to read. She sympathises, but neither does she give much away. “This book is a bit of a departure. Harry is very angry. Very angry. And he’s angry for most of the book. But I think that is fair enough given what has happened to him and that he hasn’t been given an awful lot of information. So it’s not a very gentle tale. And there is a nasty death in it as well. Nasty because it is someone I care about as a character.”

She adds: “This time it is someone I consider to be a main character.” She cried when she wrote the death scene, as she did twice when writing Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.

Harry now “is very much in puberty, having as easy a time of it as I did.” And that was? “What I was, I wasn’t sure and I don’t think anyone else was either! I just think it is a very confusing time. Yes, he’s very confused in a boy way. He doesn’t understand how girls’ minds work.” I say that, at age 15, boys don’t normally say anything at all. She laughs and says Hermione is more than happy to fill in all those silences with her advice.

“This time Harry really, for the first time, does have a relationship of sorts. The emphasis very much on the ‘of sorts’. That was really fun to write, actually. I think you will find it painful. You should find it painful, it is painful, but it was such fun to write. Poor Harry! What I put him through.”

She has already started to write Book Six. “I started it when I was pregnant. That was a different situation because I knew I didn’t have to so that immediately meant that I wanted to! You know, the absolute reverse of Goblet of Fire. And I’m also in a very lovely position. Contractually, I don’t even have to write any more books at all. So no one can possibly write that I have missed a deadline because I actually don’t have a contractual deadline for Six and Seven.”

So you have freedom, I say.

“I do have freedom. I want to spend some time with David because I didn’t have him to hand him over to a battalion of nannies. But I do really want to do Six and Seven.”

Surely, I say, Six will be shorter. And she agrees. “Seven, on the other hand, will probably be massive …it has been such a massive part of my life now. I can see myself being really scared to let go of it. I will probably reach the end of Seven and think, I’ll just tweak it a bit more, I will just tweak it a bit more. The fact that I will have finished will be extraordinary.”

But isn’t the last chapter of Seven already written? Yes, she says, it’s hidden away. In a secret place? “Guarded by trolls.”

Doesn’t anyone know?

“I’ve told no one. Literally no one. If you ever hear anyone claim that they know what happens in the end, they are absolutely lying. I’ve never told anyone.”

Maybe if you got drunk …

“I would never tell anyone. I just know I wouldn’t. You couldn’t get me drunk enough!”

It is time to go. David has exhausted his mobiles and swings and we have talked for one and a half hours. This interview is very different from the previous one, and it seems to me that in the past three years Joanne Rowling has grown up. She has faced her personal demons about fame, money and insecurity. She has balance in her life and now, in addition to everything else, freedom. It is a heady mix, certainly a Wonderland, but she will tread softly there. “I am the kind of person who expects Mr Catastrophe to be lurking around the corner because he often has been. “I try to strike a balance between being very grateful for what has happened – because I am so hugely grateful for it – and I am terrified of hubris because I think it could all go wrong tomorrow.”

Leia mais

A fama de J.K. Rowling deteriora sua cultura café

Tradução: Salas Wulfric
Revisão: {patylda}

Ferguson, Brian. “JK Rowling’s fame spoils her cafe culture,” The Scotsman, 6 February 2003.

THE story of struggling single mother JK Rowling penning her first Harry Potter book in the warmth of an Edinburgh cafe has become part of the legend of her success.

But now the internationally famous author has revealed that she still wants to write in cafes – but cannot because of her fame.

The revelation from the notoriously private author in a scoop interview by Edinburgh schoolchildren may even explain why her latest book was so long in the writing and delayed. There had been speculation she was suffering from writer’s block.

Now the multi-millionaire has told how she longs to return to the kind of environment where she spent hours dreaming up storylines while her daughter Jessica slept in a push-chair.

In an the interview for an Edinburgh school’s magazine, the usually guarded Ms Rowling has revealed how she still sees a large cafe with a window seat as her “ideal writing space”.

But she has admitted it is now impossible for her to sit in cafes like Nicolson’s, in Nicolson Street, where Harry Potter was created, because of her fame.

In the interview for Broughton High’s magazine, the author also tells how she had suffered feelings of “general hopelessness” while writing the first book, how she worried that she would never finish it, and of the “indescribable” feeling of pride she felt when she saw it on sale for the first time.

Ms Rowling has denied basing any of the characters in the books on real people, except for herself, attacked people who have called for the books to be banned as “misguided”, and told how one of her remaining ambitions is learning to drive.

The school magazine’s team secured an interview with crime writer Ian Rankin for the same edition, and have also interviewed celebrities such as Gail Porter and dance music guru Moby in the past.

But they are remaining tight-lipped about how they managed to secure the JK Rowling scoop, saying only they were helped by a “go-between”.

The famously-guarded Ms Rowling, whose first Harry Potter book was published in 1997, has granted very few interviews over the last couple of years.

Three senior students working on the magazine – Nicola Nairn, Adam Knight and Jennifer Milne – worked on a list of questions which were sent via e-mail to the author.

She told the magazine: “My ideal writing space is a large cafe with a small corner table near a window overlooking an interesting street (for gazing out of in search of inspiration).

“It would serve very strong coffee and be non-smoking (because I’ve now given up for two years and don’t want to be tempted) and nobody would notice me at all. But I can’t write in cafes any more because I would get recognised a lot.”

In response to being asked if she felt like giving up writing the first book, she said: “Several times a feeling of general hopelessness would come over me and I’d wonder whether I wasn’t deluding myself. But this feeling never lasted longer than an evening.

“It was an indescribable feeling of pride (seeing the first book on the shelves), something close to the feeling I had when I saw my daughter for the first time.

Ms Rowling also revealed how the main female character in the books – Harry’s friend Hermione – is an “exaggerated” version of herself, but insists all the others are completely fictional.

Wendy Munro, head of media studies at the school, said students were completely responsible for writing, editing and designing The High magazine.

She said: ” Our contact vetted all the questions that we compiled, they were then sent on to her for approval and a week later was got all these replies.”

Nicola, 17, associate editor at the magazine, said: “We were so surprised to get the interview but it all turned out great.”

Leia mais

Rowling encontra um significado para a fama

Tradução: Camila Weasley
Revisão: Adriana snape ** Adriana Snape

McQuillan, Rebecca. “Rowling finds a meaning in fame,” Bookshelf, December 2002
The creator of Harry Potter tells Rebecca McQuillan how celebrity and its trappings have given her the ability to campaign in memory of her mother

SHE may be an internationally renowned author with a fortune to rival Madonna’s but according to J K Rowling, it is not the financial rewards of success that have given her the most satisfaction since she shot to fame as the creator of Harry Potter. It is something far more personal. “For me, being able to campaign and fund-raise for multiple sclerosis is the most personally meaningful thing to have come out of being famous,” she says. “It would mean everything to me if I thought even one person did not have to go through what my mother did.”

In the two years since Rowling became patron of the Multiple Sclerosis Society Scotland, she has foregone her well-guarded privacy to campaign and fund-raise on its behalf, driven on by the memory of her mother, Anne, who died of respiratory failure linked to MS when she was 45. Looking back now on her first two years as a campaigner, Rowling reveals that the personal thanks of MS sufferers and their families has meant a huge amount to her. “The biggest feedback I’ve got is from letters and people coming up to me in the street – people who have MS themselves or those with friends and relatives with MS – saying how happy they are to see the subject getting some media coverage,” she says.

A Hallowe’en Ball she hosted at Stirling Castle the weekend before the launch of {Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets }raised £275,000, smashing the target of £100,000. “I can’t tell you how happy that made me; I was still beaming about it at the film premiere two days later. We got enough money on that one night to double the number of MS nurses in Scotland, though we still need the commitment of health boards and the Scottish Executive.”

Talking exclusively to The {Herald }as a £500,000 MS research group, largely funded by Rowling, is launched in Aberdeen, the author says she is not just hopeful that a cure will be found – she is positive. The question is when. But she condemns the Scottish Executive’s failure to fund research into the disease or draw up national guidelines on care standards, even though Scotland has the highest per capita incidence of MS in the world.

She knows how it feels to watch a desperately loved relative suffer for lack of better care and treatment. Her mother, whom she has described as an energetic, youthful figure with a contagious laugh, a keen gardener who swam, played badminton, and walked the dog for miles, started having trouble lifting the teapot when the young Joanne was just 12. Anne put the pins’n’needles feeling she experienced down to a touch of rheumatism or a trapped nerve. But within two years it had spread up her arm and across her chest. At the age of 35, she was told she had multiple sclerosis, a neurological condition in which the body’s immune system malfunctions and starts attacking the brain and the spinal chord.

She remained “relentlessly cheerful” when anyone asked her about her health but when she was just over 40 she started using a wheelchair outside the house and, at 42, was using a walking frame inside it. Rowling last saw her just before Christmas 1990 and on New Year’s Eve, she died.

Rowling, 37, who has a nine-year-old daughter, Jessica, and is pregnant with her second child, deeply regrets that her mother did not have the help of specialist carers, such as nurses and physiotherapists, who could have helped her to overcome the isolation that increased as her mobility diminished. “Physiotherapy helped her physically when she received it, though we never seemed able to establish on-going care. People came and went; she was living in a rural area – just as so many people with MS are in Scotland,” she says.

“I saw my mother’s health decline steadily from the age of 35 until her death at 45. The care was intermittent and inadequate and she never came into sight of a specialist MS nurse. Nobody should have to suffer that lack of care or isolation in a rich, western country.”

Although no-one knows yet what causes MS, researchers believe genes may play a part. For Rowling, that worry does surface sometimes. “I was told when I was about 18 that there was a ‘familial tendency’ by a doctor I saw at university,” she says. “I understood that to mean that I’m a bit more likely to get MS than the next person, though a lot of people are the only ones in their family with MS and there seems to be no hereditary link at all. The only time I’ve ever been scared was last year when I hurt my back and my legs went numb for a while. It turned out that I was being paranoid, but it did bring back a lot of memories of my mother’s first symptoms.”

Rowling did not lack information about the condition when her mother was diagnosed because, like her mother, her reaction was to try to read as much as she could about it. She praises the MS Society Scotland (“I’ve never met so many dedicated people packed into such a small place”) which, for some Scottish MS sufferers, is the only source of information and support.

Informing the wider public about the disease is not so easy but TV can help. In the Emmy award-winning drama {The West Wing}, President Jed Bartlett, played by Martin Sheen, has MS and manages to keep it quiet for years. Rowling is pleased that the disease features in the programme, not least because she and her family are “obsessed” by it. “Sometimes we have to remind ourselves that Jed Bartlett is fictional, so as to stop ourselves writing him fan mail,” she says. The more ardent among her Harry Potter fans will recognise the sentiment.

She points out that the fictional President Bartlett does not have a very severe form of MS, but, even so, agrees it is “very useful” to see a character living with the condition. It has not always been so sensitively portrayed. “I will never forget watching an episode of {Fame }with my mother when I was about 15 – she had just been diagnosed. A beautiful young dancer popped up in this particular episode and the curly-haired keyboard player character, whose name escapes me, fell in love with her. The dancer became progressively more ill and was diagnosed with MS in the space of about 20 minutes. And I remember my mother saying tearfully ‘but does she end up his girlfriend?’ Well, of course she didn’t – it was {Fame }- people weren’t allowed to be ill in {Fame}. She never appeared again. So I am all for President Bartlett fighting MS onscreen. I’ll bet there are a few people out there who found out what MS was from {The West Wing}, which can’t be bad.”

While TV may be doing its bit, she is much less impressed with the action, or lack of it, taken over the past three years by the Scottish Executive. Despite of the high incidence of MS in Scotland, where 10,400 people have the disease, many of them between 20 and 40, the Scottish Executive does not fund any research into the condition. Nor, as yet, has the executive set national clinical standards for MS care or assigned a higher priority to neurological conditions, as has been done in England and Wales.

Rowling says that the lack of progress makes her feel “perplexed and angry”.

“Perplexed because people with MS will tell you that the standard of care varies greatly depending on the area of Scotland in which you live. Angry – it’s obvious why.”

The lack of funding for research is “deeply disappointing”.

“The Westminster government does fund a small percentage of research into MS, but here in Scotland, nothing – and yet MS is more prevalent in Scotland than in any country in the world.”

There has been one major step forward in the past year. In February, the UK government forged a deal with pharmaceutical companies whereby Beta Interferon would be made available to those who could benefit from it, ending the bane of postcode prescribing. Rowling was delighted when she heard, not least because she felt that the argument against its use – its expense – was fallacious. “Compare the cost of maintaining somebody’s health and mobility – possibly so that they can continue working – with the cost of relegating them to a life-time of state-funded or family care. I’ve met people with MS whose partners have been forced to give up work to care for them full-time. I would be interested to hear how anyone thinks providing Beta Interferon is a more expensive option than having two people give up their jobs and become state-supported.”

The new group in Aberdeen is an important development for MS research in Scotland, where work on the fundamental causes of the disease is not well-represented.

The team will be headed by the internationally-renowned MS expert, Dr Chris Linnington, who has worked on MS at the Max Plank Institute for Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany, for the past 12 years.

Dr Linnington has high hopes for the research group and believes that if developments in research continue at their current rate, there could be important breakthroughs on the horizon.

“I would be surprised if we don’t see significant progress in the next 10 years. It may not be a cure, but it may mean we detect it earlier and find treatments that will delay the progress to such an extent that people may live well into old age.”

Aberdeen’s fame as a centre for medical imaging will help the researchers. Using nuclear mag-netic resonance they will be able to see what is happening inside the brains of sufferers. They will also investigate the reasons why the immune system appears to attack the optic nerve first in MS sufferers and to what extent genetic and environmental factors might contribute to causing the disease.

Rowling says she would be happy with any advance the group manages to make. For her part, she will continue campaigning. Given her commitment to awareness-raising, she might be expected to try and write a character with the disease into one of her multimillion-selling Harry Potter novels. Well, it’s not quite as simple as that. As Rowling explains: “One problem with the world of Hogwarts – or not, depending on how you look at it – is that, being wizards, they tend not to have to suffer what the rest of us do. I spent ages working out what magic could and couldn’t do with regard to illness and decided that normal human ailments – such as MS – could be cured. It’s a bit harder in the real world, but we’re going to see what we can do up in Aberdeen.

Leia mais

Harry Potter e Eu

Tradução: Virag
Revisão: {patyda}
*OK Categorias e Conteúdo

“Harry Potter and Me,” A&E Biography, 13 November 2002
This is the American version of 2001’s BBC Christmas Special

Narrator: Just a few years ago, JK Rowling was broke and jobless, a single mother who spent her afternoons writing in Edinborough coffee shops while her baby slept. Today she is rich and famous, the most popular children’s author on the planet.

(“‘Cause It’s Witchcraft” plays)

The Potter books she created evolved into international bestsellers and the first Harry Potter move was a blockbuster success. Her legions of fans are desperate for the next installment of the boy wizard’s adventures. But it is JK Rowling’s story that is the most amazing of all; only now has she agreed to tell it in her own words.

JK Rowling: A lot of rubbish has been written. Not necessarily malicious rubbish, but things get exaggerated and distorted and I just thought maybe the moment has come just to um, just to say how it happened. Truthfully. And then I can at least go easy to my bed and think, well the truth’s out there. And people can take it or leave it.

Narrator: Harry’s arrival on the door step of his muggle, or non-magic relatives, the Dursley’s, is the start of an epic journey. Harry grows up thinking he’s just an ordinary boy until he finds out that in the wizard world his name is legendary and he’s destined to attend Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.

Then Harry’s adventures really begin as he and his classmates, Hermione and Ron, battle with the dark forces of magic; a story that JK Rowling has meticulously planned to tell over seven books, one for each school year.

It was a journey that began back in 1990.

JK Rowling: I was going by train from Manchester to London, sitting there, thinking of nothing to do with writing and the idea came out of nowhere and I could see Harry very clearly; this scrawny little boy and it was the most physical rush of excitement. I’ve never felt that excited about anything to do with writing. I’ve never had an idea that gave me such a physical response. So I’m rummaging through this bag to try and find a pen or a pencil or anything. I didn’t even have an eyeliner on me. So I just had to sit and think. And for four hours, because they train was delayed, I had all these ideas bubbling up through my head.

(Excerpt from PS/SS read by Stephen Fry: Harry was small and skinny, with brilliant green eyes and jet black hair that was always untidy. He wore round glasses and on his forehead was a thin, lightning shaped scar.)

I can’t describe the excitement to someone who doesn’t write books except to say it was that incredibly elated feeling you get when you’ve just met someone with whom you might eventually fall in love. That was . . that was the kind of feeling I had getting off the train. As though I’d just met someone wonderful and we were about to embark on this wonderful affair. That kind of elation, that light headedness and that excitement. And, um, so I got back to my flat in Clapham Junction and started writing. And I’ve now been writing for 10 years, so it’s been a good affair.

(Images & Video of King’s Cross Station)

For me, King’s Cross is a very, very romantic place. Probably the most romantic station purely because my parent’s met here. So that’s always been part of my childhood folklore. My dad had just joined the navy, my mum had just joined the Wrens. They were both traveling up to Abroath in Scotland from London and they met on the train pulling out of King’s Cross. So, um, I wanted Harry to go to Hogwarts by train. I just love trains, I’m a bit nerdy like that, and obviously therefore it had to be King’s Cross.

(Excerpt from SS/PS Film:

Harry: Excuse me, sir, can you tell me where I might find Platform 9 ¾? 9 ¾?
Conductor: Think you’re being funny, do ya?)

Like a lot in the Harry Potter books, it was reality with a twist. I wanted to find another entrance to the magical world, but I didn’t want a kind of time warp thing. I like the entrances to be places you can only find if you have the knowledge. So anyone who ran at the barrier with enough confidence would be able to break through, um, onto this platform between platform 9, platform 10.

(Excerpt from SS/PS Film:

Mrs. Weasley: Best do it at a bit of a run if you’re nervous.
Ginny Weasley: Good luck.)

I wrote Platform 9 ¾ when I was living in Manchester and I wrongly visualized the platforms and I was actually thinking of Euston. Um, so anyone who’s actually been to the real platforms 9 and 10 in King’s Cross will realize they don’t bear a great resemblance to the platforms 9 and 10 as described in the book. So that was just me coming clean there. I was in Manchester. I couldn’t check.

It was five years from the train journey where I had the original idea to finishing the book. And during those five years this mass of material was generated, some of which will never find it’s way into the book – will never need to be in the books – it’s . . . it’s just stuff I need to know for my own pleasure – partly for my own pleasure and partly because I like reading a book where I have the sense that the author knows everything. They might not be telling me everything but you have that confidence that the author really knows everything.

(Rowling on the floor, papers everywhere, going through notes, papers, notebooks on the Harry Potter Universe)

Ok, so this is um, to the untrained eye might look like a pile of wastepaper, but um, this is 10 years work. As you can see I file meticulously. And I know where every single piece of paper is (coughs in sarcasm). I’ve dragged out a few bits and pieces.

So this is the name of everyone in Harry’s year. And all these little symbols mean what house they’re in, how magical they are, what their parentage is because I needed this later for the death eaters and so on and the various allegiances that would be set up within the school.

I like this. This was ages – this was ’98 and this was me trying to find words for the Dementors. So I’ve all these Latin words written all over the inside of my diary.

I used to cover just about anything with writing as you can see. This is my application for housing benefit in 28 Gardiner’s Crescent which is where I – the first place I lived, obviously, when I was in Edinburgh um, treated with complete lack of respect by me.

Discarded first chapters of book one. I reckon I must’ve got through fifteen different alternative chapters of book one. The reason for which I discarded each of them were they all gave too much away. And in fact if you put all those discarded first chapters together, almost the whole plot is explained.

This is an old notebook in which I worked out, and again I don’t want you to come close on this, that is the history of the death eaters.

Where’s my Portuguese diary (in US we call them Planners) gone? There it is. So this is a Portuguese diary, as you can see. Not filled in. Uh, because I’ve never filled in a diary in my life. But it had paper in it to write on. So we have another draft of book one, chapter one.

I drew a lot of pictures. I drew them for no one but me. I just wanted to what, what characters looked like. So anyway, that was Argus Filch. No prizes. Snape obviously. That is um, Harry, arriving in Privet Drive with Professor Mcgonagall, and Hagrid, and Dumbledore. That was a Gringott’s cart. Mirror of Erised. That’s the Weasley’s. Professor Sprout. I like this one. I thought I’d lost this picture actually. Because I was going to show it to Chris Columbus. Um, and true to form I only found it when it was no use and they’d already, they had already filmed that bit anyway. But this is how the entrance to Diagon Alley works in my imagination. So Chris is going to murder me when he finds out I had a pic of it all along and he was asking me how it worked. But it was buried in boxes.

(Excerpt from SS/PS Film – entrance to Diagon Alley.

Hagrid: Welcome, Harry, to Diagon Alley.)

Narrator: As JK Rowling continued to build Harry’s world, her own fell apart. She arrived in Edinburgh in 1993, after a brief time teaching English in Portugal. There she’d married, had a baby, and then left her husband. She had no job, virtually no money, and a tiny daughter to support.

JK Rowling: That was the phase where the ‘penniless single mother’ sort of tag to my name came along, which is true. But it wasn’t enough that I was a penniless single mother, I had to write on napkins ‘cause I couldn’t afford paper and then we started straying into the realms of the ridiculous. Let’s not exaggerate here, let’s not pretend I had to write on napkins, because I didn’t. They’ve started sort of adding little bits and pieces that just weren’t necessary because the stark reality was bad enough.

(Cut to outside Rowling’s old apartment in Edinburgh)

I haven’t been back here since 1994, when I moved out. And um, I don’t like being back here, which is no offense to the place, but I’ve uh, I’ve kind of avoided this place since I moved out in um, just in deference to the fact that it was a pretty unhappy six months. I did a lot of writing here. I would say it’s here that really the first book became a book, as opposed to three chapters and a collection of notes. So are we going to go in then? Off we go.

You couldn’t really objectively speaking look around and say ‘Well, you’ve made a success of your life.’ I was 28, I was living on benefit. I was living on about 70 pounds a week, I had no work. And so, suddenly being in position where actually I couldn’t support myself because obviously anyone who’s tried to get state child care will know that you’ll be very lucky to get the kind of child care that means you can even work part time. So it was all a real shock to the system.

(Inside the apartment)

Oh my god. This is um. This is, this is so different. This. . oh my gosh. Oh wow. This is so so different to how it was when I was here. This is nice. This is really nice. And I’m really glad. You just expect time to stand still when you’ve walked away from a place, and I should know better. I have just been . . . every time I come anywhere near this place or passed it in a bus or a taxi I’ve imagined as it was when I . . when I lived here. And it’s, it’s all been . . . I would have been delighted to live here. This is great actually. It is. It’s like an exorcism. Everything was just very very very dilapidated. And always filthy, which wasn’t the flat’s fault, it was normally my fault because people very often say to me ‘how did you do it, how did you raise a baby and write a book?’ And the answer is – I didn’t do housework for four years. I am not superwoman. And um, living in squalor, that was the answer.

During the day I was writing in cafes, as everyone famously knows. But can I just say for the record, once and for all, ‘cause it’s really irritating me, I did not write in cafes to escape my unheated flat. Because I am not stupid enough to rent an unheated flat in Edinburgh in mid-winter. It had heating. I went out and wrote in cafes because the way to make Jessica fall asleep was to keep her moving in the push chair. So I used to take her out, tire her out, put her in the push chair, walk her along, moment she fell asleep into the nearest café and write.

(Enters Nicolson’s Café)

So this is Nicolson’s, where I wrote huge parts of the book. Um, this was a really great place to write because there are so many tables around here that I didn’t feel too guilty about taking a table up for too long. And, um, that was my favorite table. I always wanted to try and get that one because it was out of the way in the corner.

(Words on screen: Back in 1997. Rowling shown in corner café window writing.)

It was just great to look up while you were writing and stop and think about things and be able to look out on the street, which was quite busy. They were pretty tolerant of me in here partly because one of the owners is my brother-in-law. And I used to say to them ‘Well you know, it gets published and I’ll try to get you loads of publicity.’ And it was all just a big joke. No one ever dreamt for a moment that was going to happen.

To muster the willpower to keep going with no promise of publication, obviously I must have really believed in the story and I did. I really believed in it. But it was more a feeling of – I have to do right by this book – I have to give it my best shot. But at the same time my realistic side was reminding me that a completely unknown author always has a struggle to get published. And who knew? Just because I thought it was so great was no guarantee that anyone else would like it.

Narrator: JK Rowling sent her manuscripts off and lined herself up a literary agent, only to find that publishing houses threw Harry on the reject pile.

Christopher Little (Literary Agent): In the very beginning, we were very excited about it in, in the agency. But it was a very difficult book to sell. Um, and an, quite a large number of publishers turned it down. It was too long, it dealt with going away to school, which is something that was regarded as being not politically correct.

Barry Cunningham (Former Editor at Bloomsbury): Well of course everybody now denies turning it down. And, um, uh, and want to distance themselves from this, uh, from this terrible terrible error.

JK Rowling: Is it nice to name names? You’re nodding, but I don’t think it’s very nice to name names.

Christopher Little (Literary Agent): It was all the major publishers we know.

Barry Cunningham (Former Editor at Bloomsbury): Among them Puffin and Collins, for sure. It’s like turning down the Beatles, isn’t it?
The very first question she asked me was ‘how do you feel about sequels?’ And then she told me the entire story of Harry Potter, all through the entire series. I realized of course that she knew exactly about this world and where it was going and who it was going to include, how the character would develop and of course it was fascinating because this doesn’t normally happen. Children’s book characters don’t grow up in real time normally, you know, their locked in the time they are and the sequels are endless re-runs of the same kind of adventures. But to have a character developing in real time as his age developed was a really interesting idea.

I gave Jo one memorable piece of advice. Uh, after our first lunch together we were sitting down and I said, ‘The important thing, Jo is for you to –

JK Rowling: – keep your real job.’ He said, um, Barry said, and Christopher, my agent also said to me –

Christopher Little (Literary Agent): – children’s authors, you know, really don’t make any money.

JK Rowling: They, both of them, were at pains to say to me ‘We really like the book, but um, you know it’s not that commercial.’

Narrator: Bloomsbury publishing acquired what would become the biggest phenomenon in modern literature for only 2,500 pounds. That’s about $4000.

JK Rowling: That was, second to the birth of my daughter, the best moment of my life. Christopher phoned me up on a Friday afternoon and he said it so matter of factly.

Christopher Little (Literary Agent): She was speechless, certainly for at least the period of time it takes to build enough steam for a big scream, I think.

JK Rowling: And he said ‘Are you alright, are you still there?’ And I said ‘Um, well it’s just that my only lifetime ambition has just been fulfilled.’ And I was – that was the best. The best moment. Nothing since has come anywhere close to the fact that I was actually going to be in print. It was going to be an actual book in a bookshop. The best moment, oh my God.

Narrator: JK Rowling introduced both Harry and her readers to a magical world in Harry Potter and Philosopher’s Stone. Not only does Harry find out he’s a wizard, but a famous one at that. He’s renowned as the miraculous survivor of a brutal attack by the evil Lord Voldemort, who murdered his parents. Through his adventures at Hogwarts, Harry begins to find out the mysteries of his past.

Philip Pullman (writer): The orphan is an excellent protagonist for any story because they’re free and yet they’re bereft. They’re bereft of what gives a child most of the sense of who he or she is and where they come from and where they belong. So they cut adrift in some strange way. They have this great need – because we all need to know where we come from and we need to find where we will eventually belong.

(Excerpt from SS/PS Film:

Sorting Hat: Hmm. Difficult. Very difficult. Plenty of courage, I see. Not a bad mind either. There’s talent, oh yes, and a thirst to prove yourself. But where to put you?

Harry Potter: Not Slytherin, not Slytherin.

Sorting Hat: Not Slytherin, eh?)

JK Rowling: When he first arrives at school he’s totally unsure, he has the feelings we all have – as adults as well – when you enter a new place and you don’t know what’s going on. But greatly exaggerated by the fact that he is set apart even there by his fame and his ancestry. And, um, this curious quirk, um, that meant that he survived this, what should have been a fatal, attack.

He’s every boy, but with a twist.

Narrator: JK Rowling mixture of the everyday and the magical, the matter-of-fact, and the mystical permeates her books.

(Excerpt from SS/PS read by Stephen Fry: ‘You are here to learn the subtle science and exact art of potion making’, he began. He spoke in barely more than a whisper, but they caught every word. Like Professor McGonagall, Snape had the gift of keeping a class silent without effort. ‘As there is little foolish wand waving here, many of you will hardly believe this is magic. I don’t expect you will really understand the beauty of the softly simmering cauldron with it’s shimmering fumes, the delicate power of liquids that creep through human veins, bewitching the mind and ensnaring the senses. I can teach you how to bottle fame, brew glory, and even stopper death.’ )

JK Rowling: I don’t believe in witchcraft, though I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve been told I’m a practicing witch. Ninety – let’s say ninety five percent at least, of the magic in the books in entirely invented by me. And I’ve used things from folklore and I’ve used bits of what people used to believe worked magically just to add a certain flavor, but I’ve always twisted them to suit my own ends. I mean, I’ve taken liberties with folklore, um, to suit my plot.

Witches and wizards are a huge part of children’s literature. It’ll never go away, I don’t think it will ever, ever, ever go away, 100 years, 200 years time there’ll be another kind of wizard’s story.

Narrator: In 1997, JK had moved on to the second book in the series, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. Book one was doing well, but nowhere near its popularity today. JK Rowling was still making her living as a teacher.
Then something happened that would change her world forever. In 1997, Harry Potter cast a spell on America. American publishers got caught up in a bidding war for the book.

Arthur A. Levine (VP, Scholastic Publishing): My boss would say, ‘ok, do you love it?’ and I’d say ‘Yes, I love it.’ ‘Ok, stay in the auction. Do you love it this many dollars?’ ‘Uh, yeah.’ I kept saying yes, I just was getting more and more nervous, um, because at the end of the day this is more money than I had ever paid any author as an advance, let alone an advance for a first novel. It was unprecedented.
And she said, ‘Do you love it $105,000?’ And I said, ‘Yes! Yes!’ And she said, ‘Well go ahead and make that offer.’ And that was it.

Narrator: The deal with Scholastic meant that at last JK Rowling could fulfill her life long ambition: to become a full time writer.

JK Rowling’s memories of her childhood have profoundly influenced her writing. She was born in 1965 in Chipping Sodbury, and grew up near Bristol with her parents, Ann and Peter and her younger sister, Di. She admits to being bookish and bossy as a child, not unlike one of Harry’s best friends.

(Excerpt from SS/PS Film:

Ron: Wingardium Leviosa!

Hermione: No, stop stop stop. You’re going to take someone’s eye out. Besides, you’re saying it wrong. It’s levi-o-sa. Not levio-sa.

Ron: You do it then if you’re so clever.)

JK Rowling: When I started to write Hermione, when I actually got hold of a pen, she came incredibly easily, um, largely because she’s me.

(Excerpt from SS/PS Film:

Ron: Go on, Go on.

Hermione: Wingardium Leviosa. [feather floats])

I was swotty, and I had that, you know, sense of insecurity underneath. Trying to compensate for that by getting everything right all the time. And like Hermione, I projected a false confidence, which I know was very irritating to people at times, but underneath it all, I felt completely and utterly inadequate, which is why I completely understand Hermione.

Narrator: Even as a very young child, JK Rowling loved to write, completing her first book at the age of six.

JK Rowling: The first finished book I did was a book called ‘Rabbit,’ um, about a Rabbit called Rabbit. Thereby revealing the imaginative approach to names that has, um, stood me in such good stead ever since. Um, and I wrote the Rabbit stories for ages to the point where, um, a series, a series of books about Rabbit which were very dull, um, illustrated by the author.

The one book I could say that specifically influenced my work was, um, The Little White Horse, by Elizabeth Goudge. She always listed the exact food they were eating. Wherever you were in the book, whenever you had a meal, you knew exactly what was in the sandwiches. And I just remember finding that so satisfying as a child.

(Excerpt from PoA, read by Stephen Fry: There were shelves upon shelves of the must succulent looking sweets imaginable. Creamy chunks of nougat, shimmering pink squares of coconut ice, fat honey-colored toffess, hundreds of different kinds of chocolate in neat rows. There was a large barrel of Every Flavor Beans and another of Fizzing Whizbees, the levitating sherbet balls that Ron had mentioned.)

As I moved into my teens I was into very dramatic, gritty realism, entirely influenced by Barry Hines and Kes. Unfortunately I didn’t live in a northern town. My urban landscape wasn’t very developed because I lived in Chepstow, in the middle of a lot of fields and it’s quite hard to be a disaffected urban youth in the middle of a muddy field.

(Outside cottage in Chepstow)

So this is a cottage, obviously, where I lived from the age of nine. My bedroom’s furthest on the right and, uh, I spent an awful lot of time in that bedroom writing. I have very happy memories of this place. It’s quite emotional being back here actually, because, um, I’ve only once been – because my dad left this house shortly after my mother died. So I’ve only once been back here since my mum died.
I remember hanging out of my bedroom window, smoking behind the curtains late at night. My father will not be happy to hear that. I wasn’t very clever about that either. Because, you know, I used to leave the cigarette, the cigarette ends were, you know, below the window, I mean – ‘Oh yes, someone from the pub dad’s been throwing them into the garden again.’

It was at Wydean that I met Sean, which has been a very important friendship in my life – huge friendship in my life. I always felt a bit of an outsider and that might, perhaps explain why Sean and I were so close because he came in late, like me he didn’t have a local accent, and so I think, to an extent, we both felt like outsiders in the place, and that probably formed quite a big bond between us.

So this is, um, Sean, to whom the second Harry Potter book is dedicated, and Ron owes a fair bit to Sean. I never set out to describe Sean in Ron, but Rean has a Sean-ish turn of phrase.

(Excerpt from SS/PS:

Ron: Whew. We made it. Can you imagine the look on McGonagall’s face if we were late? (McGonagall transforms from cat to human) That was bloody brilliant.

McGonagall: Oh, thank you for that assessment, Mr. Weasley)

Sean: I think with the, the Ron character, I think what comes through, to me anyway, maybe I’ve misinterpreted it, is that he, he’s always there, or thereabouts well-intentioned.

JK Rowling: He’s always there when you need him, that’s Ron Weasley. Sean was the first of my friends to pass his driving test. And, um, he had this old Ford Anglia, old claptrap Ford Anglia – turquoise and white – which is now quite famouse as the car that the Weasley’s drive. Well I was obviously going to give the Weasley’s Sean’s old car. And that car was freedom to us. And my heart still lifts when I see an old Ford Anglia, which is a bit sad.

(Excerpt from CoS read by Stephen Fry: It was as though they had been plunged into a fabulous dream. This, thought Harry, was surely the only way to travel, past swirls of turrets of snowy cloud in a car full of hot bright sunlight with a fat pack of toffees in the glove compartment and the prospect of seeing Fred and George’s jealous faces when they landed smoothly and spectacularly on the sweeping lawn in front of Hogwarts Castle.)

He was the coolest man in school. He had a turquoise Ford Anglia –

Sean: Turquoise Ford Anglia –

JK Rowling: And you were pretty cutting edge I think.

Sean: I was in those days, yeah.

JK Rowling: Yes.

Sean: It’s all gone horribly wrong since, but –

JK Rowling: Spandau Ballet haircut. Sorry.

Sean: And, um, of an evening she’d phone up and say, ‘Come pick me up,’ and I’d drive down there and we’d head off somewhere else in the car. So the car became –

JK Rowling: And sit under the Severn bridge

Sean: And sit under the Severn bridge or else where?

JK Rowling: And discuss life. And drink. It’s a very sad life isn’t it? This – this is what we thought was exciting when we were seventeen. We used to sit down here in a Ford Anglia. Yeah, those urban kids, they don’t know what they miss.

Narrator: JK Rowling escaped small town life by attending the University of Exeter. There she earned a degree in French and Classics before moving to London. Then, a bombshell hit. Her mother, Ann, and been battling with Multiple Sclerosis for a decade when the disease took her life.

JK Rowling: Mum dying was like this depth charge in my life. The pain of her, of her going and just missing such a huge part of her life – she was 45 when she died which is far too young to die – far too young to leave your family. Never knew what we all ended up doing and so on. For mum there would have been a particular glory in being a writer because she was the real book lover. And so, it does add a little bit of poison to the knife, if you like, that the one thing that I think she really would have prized she never knew.

Perhaps two or three days after I had the idea for Harry, um, I disposed of his parents in a – in quite a brutal way. Not a cruel . . . not cruel . . . it didn’t read in a cruel way, but I mean it was very cut and dry, nothing lingering, no debate about how it had happened or . . and that stage, no real discussion of how painful that was going to be. Well, of course, mum – mum died six months after I had written my first attempt at an opening chapter. Um, and that made an enormous difference, uh, because I was living it – I was living what I had just – what I had just written.

The Mirror of Erised is absolutely entirely drawn from my own experience of losing a parent. ‘Five more minutes, just please God, give me five more minutes.’ It’ll never be enough.

(Excerpt from SS/PS Film:

Harry: (at Mirror of Erised) Mum? Dad?)

After five minutes of telling her all about Jessie and, you know, because she – she has a grandchild whom obviously she never saw, and then I’d just be trying to tell her about the books and then I’d realize that I hadn’t asked her what was it like to be dead. Fairly significant question. But I can well imagine that happening. But it would never be long enough, that was the point of Chapter Ten. You know, it’s tougher on the living and you’ve just got to get past it.

(Excerpt from SS/PS Film:

Quirrel/Voldermort: KILL HIM!)

Death is an extremely important theme throughout all seven books, I would say possibly the most important theme. If you are writing about evil, which I am, and if you are writing about someone who’s, essentially, a psychopath – you have a duty to show the real evil of taking human life.

(Excerpt from SS/PS Film:

Quirrel/Voldermort: (screaming) What is this magic?)

More people are going to die. And, um, they, well there’s at least one death that I. . . that I . . that is going to be horrible – horrible to write. To re-write actually because it’s already written. But, um, it has to be.

Narrator: Some parents have questioned whether children can cope with the darker side of the books.

JK Rowling: It’s very interesting how parents think that they have the right to dictate to you because you’re writing reading materials for their children. I got a horrible letter on book two – very, very stuffy letter – from a mother saying, um: ‘This was a very disturbing ending. And I’m sure a writer of your ability will be able to think of a better way to end the next book.’ Um – so basically ‘liked it ‘till 2/3 of the way through but, um, if you could really address this issue in the future – and I’ll be back in touch if I find you unacceptable.’ And it was at that point that I snapped. And I wrote back and said: ‘Don’t read the rest of the books. Yours sincerely, Jo Rowling.’ There’s no point, I mean, there’s no point, I’m not taking dictation here.

Do I care about my readers? Profoundly and deeply. But do I ultimately think that they should dictate a single word of what I write? No. No, I am the only one who should be in control of that. And, I’m not writing to make anyone’s children feel safe.

Narrator: 1999 marked JK Rowlings transformation from popular author, to international superstar with the launch of Book Three – Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. For the first time ever, three books by the same author topped the New York Times best-seller list. Her book signings began to resemble rock concerts. At the stroke of midnight on July 8, 2000, Potter-mania took hold with the release of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Thousands of fans waited in line for hours for a copy.

(Random scenes from the release of Goblet of Fire:

Bookshop Clerk: “Don’t read the ending before the beginning! Don’t do that!”

Young Reader: “Oh, God, this is definitely not the way it’s supposed to start.”)

In Toronto, an audience of 12,000 gathered for the biggest book reading ever. JK Rowling was terrified.

JK Rowling: I’ve never been good at speaking in public, in fact, it’s a borderline phobic. And I thought: ‘What have I done?’
(Excerpt from Toronto Reading:

Announcer: Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls – JK Rowling!)

And I felt so pathetically, woefully inadequate for the task ahead. Just me with my book, shaking. And I had two earplugs, so I could only very distantly hear the noise of the crowd.

(Excerpt from Toronto Reading:

JK Rowling: Good Morning. I am delighted and terrified to be here to be honest with you.)

So I did my reading. And once I was up there, I was actually ok.

(Excerpt from Toronto Reading:

JK Rowling: But Dudley kept running his hand nervously over his backside . . . )

And then I finished and I said ‘Thank you very much’ and that’s – whatever I said – and I just wanted to hear what it actually sounded like. So I took out one of the plugs. And it was as though my ear drum exploded. I actually heard the noise that everyone else could hear in the stadium. It was unbelievable.

I you could take me back and you were able to tell me exactly what has happened . . . first off I wouldn’t believe you at all. Then if you managed to convince me of the truth, then I don’t know what I would have done because I would have thought, ‘I won’t be able to handle that, I won’t be able to cope with that.’ So I don’t know, um, what I would have done. And there’ll be people watching this who will never believe that because of the money, but the reality of it is has been a strange and terrible thing at times.

How ironic is it that I spent five years imagining myself into the mind of a boy who became suddenly famous. I mean I spent five years doing that – imagining what it would be like to live in total obscurity and suddenly be famous.

It’s never pleasant, when they go digging in areas that have absolutely no relevance to your work. I mean, there’s a lot of my life that has absolutely nothing to do with Harry Potter. Journalists who shall remain nameless – though I can’t really think why ‘cause I think these people should pay for their crimes – um . . went after my father. . . um. . . and pursued a very horrible line of questioning with him along the lines of ‘Why does your daughter hate you?’ Which was a bit of a shock for my dad as I’d just got off the phone from him. And, um, fairly upsetting. And they came and door stepped me – they came to my front door and started banging on the front door, and, um, that really wrong-footed me completely because in my total naivety I though, ‘Oh if I just stay at home and work,’ you know. So, um, I think then I realized this isn’t going to go away.

Narrator: And in some places the books have sparked controversy. JK Rowling has become the center of a modern day witch hunt. Some Christian groups claim the Potter books promote the occult. In South Carolina, parents have tried to ban Harry from the classroom.

(Excerpt from a Department of Education Meeting:

‘The books, uh, we believe, promote the religion of witchcraft, Wicca.’
‘I’m deeply concerned. I spent a lot of time in prayer crying because I’ve seen the effects of putting negative thoughts into the minds of our children.)

JK Rowling: The pause is due to all the very rude things I’d like to say to these people bubbling up and now I’ll say the polite version. And the polite version is: That’s not true. Not once has a child come up to me and said, ‘Due to you, I’ve decided to devote my life to the occult.’ People underestimate children so hugely – they know it’s fiction. When people are arguing from that kind of standpoint I don’t think reason works tremendously well. But I would be surprised if some of them had read the books at all.

Narrator: So far, nothing can cloud JK Rowling’s success. The long awaited Harry Potter movie achieved the biggest opening weekend in film history.

JK Rowling: The closer the viewing came, the more frightened I became to the point where when I actually sat down to watch the film, I was terrified. Because I just thought, ‘Oh please don’t do anything that’s not in the book, please don’t take horrible liberties with the plot.’

I liked it, which was a relief, as you can imagine. Yeah, I’m, I’m happy.

I am loving writing book five. Harry gets to go to places in the magical world we haven’t yet visited. More boy/girl stuff inevitably – they’re 15 now – hormones working overtime. And Harry has to ask some questions that I hope the reader will think, ‘Well why hasn’t he asked that before?’ Harry find out a lot more – a lot more in this book, um, about his past.

Narrator: Harry Potter’s life won’t completely unfold until book seven. JK Rowling has already written its last chapter.

JK Rowling: This is the thing that I was very dubious about showing you. And I don’t really know why because what does this give away. But this is the final chapter of book seven. Um, which I’m still dubious about showing you. I don’t know. Well I feel like the camera’s going to be able to see through the folder. So this is it, and I’m not opening it for obvious reasons. This is. . . this is really where I wrap everything up, it’s the epilogue. And I, I basically say what happens to everyone after they leave school – those who survive – because there are deaths – more deaths coming. It was a way of saying to myself, ‘Well you will get it, you will get to book seven one day. And then you’ll need this!’ So I’d just like to remind all the children I know who come around my house and start sneaking into cupboards that it’s not there anymore – I don’t keep it at home anymore for very, very, very obvious reasons. So there it is.

Leia mais

Harry Potter — Harry e eu

Tradução: Pink_Potter
Revisão: {patylda} fazendo

Fraser, Lindsay. “Harry Potter – Harry and me,” The Scotsman, November 2002

What did you read as a child?

MY favourite book was The Little White Horse by Elizabeth Goudge. It was probably something to do with the fact that the heroine was quite plain but it is a very well-constructed and clever book and the more you read it, the cleverer it appears. And perhaps more than any other book, it has a direct influence on the Harry Potter books. The author always included details of what her characters were eating and I remember liking that. You may have noticed that I always list the food being eaten at Hogwarts.

My most influential writer, without a doubt, is Jessica Mitford. When my great-aunt gave me Hons and Rebels when I was 14, she instantly became my heroine. She ran away from home to fight in the Spanish Civil War, taking with her a camera that she had charged to her father’s account. I wished I’d had the nerve to do something like that. I love the way she never outgrew some of her adolescent traits, remaining true to her politics – she was a self-taught socialist – throughout her life. I think I’ve read everything she wrote. I even called my daughter after her.

What did you do when you left school?

I went to Exeter University for four years, including a year teaching English in Paris, which I loved. At first Exeter was a bit of a shock. I was expecting to be among lots of similar people – thinking radical thoughts. But it wasn’t like that. However, once I’d made friends with some like-minded people, I began to enjoy myself. Although I don’t think I worked as hard as I could have.

Why did you choose to study languages when you loved English literature so much?

That was a bit of a mistake. I certainly didn’t do everything my parents told me but I think I was influenced by their belief that languages would be better for finding a job. I don’t regret it hugely but it was a strange decision for someone who only really wanted to be a writer, not that I’d had the courage to tell anyone that, of course.

Where did you go once you had graduated?

That was an even bigger mistake. I went to London to do a bilingual secretarial course. I was – am – totally unsuited to that kind of work. Me as a secretary? I’d be your worst nightmare. But the one thing I did learn to do was to type. Now I type all my own books, so that’s been incredibly useful. I’m pretty fast.

When did the idea for Harry Potter first enter your head?

My boyfriend was moving to Manchester and wanted me to move, too. It was during the train journey back from Manchester to London, after a weekend looking for a flat, that Harry Potter made his appearance. I have never felt such a huge rush of excitement. I knew immediately that this was going to be such fun to write.

I didn’t know then that it was going to be a book for children – I just knew that I had this boy. Harry. During that journey I also discovered Ron, Nearly Headless Nick, Hagrid and Peeves. But with the idea of my life careering round my head, I didn’t have a pen that worked! And I never went anywhere without my pen and notebook. So, rather than trying to write it, I had to think it. And I think that was a very good thing. I was besieged by a mass of detail and if it didn’t survive that journey it probably wasn’t worth remembering.

Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry was the first thing I concentrated on. I was thinking of a place of great order but immense danger, with children who had skills with which they could overwhelm their teachers. Logically, it had to be set in a secluded place and pretty soon I settled on Scotland, in my mind. I think it was in subconscious tribute to where my parents had married. People keep saying they know what I based Hogwarts on – but they’re all wrong. I have never seen a castle anywhere that looks the way I imagine Hogwarts.

So, I got back to the flat that night and began to write it all down in a tiny cheap notebook. I wrote lists of all the subjects to be studied – I knew there had to be seven. The characters came first and then I had to find names to fit them. Gilderoy Lockhart is a good example. I knew his name had to have an impressive ring to it. I was looking through the Dictionary of Phrase and Fable – a great source for names – and came across Gilderoy, a handsome Scottish highwayman. Exactly what I wanted. And then I found Lockhart on a war memorial to the First World War. The two together said everything I wanted about the character.

Can you describe the process of creating the stories?

It was a question of discovering why Harry was where he was, why his parents were dead. I was inventing it but it felt like research. By the end of that train journey I knew it was going to be a seven-book series. I know that’s extraordinarily arrogant for somebody who had never been published but that’s how it came to me. It took me five years to plan the series out, to plot through each of the seven novels. I know what and who’s coming when, and it can feel like greeting old friends. Professor Lupin, who appears in the third book, is one of my favourite characters. He’s a damaged person, literally and metaphorically. I think it’s important for children to know that adults, too, have their problems, that they struggle. His being a werewolf is a metaphor for people’s reactions to illness and disability. I almost always have complete histories for my characters. If I put all that detail in, each book would be the size of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, but I do have to be careful that I don’t just assume that the reader knows as much as I do. Sirius Black is a good example. I have a whole childhood worked out for him. The readers don’t need to know that but I do. I need to know much more than them because I’m the one moving the characters across the page.

I invented the game of Quidditch after a huge row with the boyfriend I lived with in Manchester. I stormed out of the house, went to the pub – and invented Quidditch.

Did you give up work to write the books?

Oh no! I moved to Manchester and worked for the Manchester Chamber of Commerce – rather briefly, because almost immediately I was made redundant. I then went to work at the university but I was really very unhappy. My mother had died about a month after I moved there. And then we were burgled and everything my mother had left me was stolen. People were incredibly kind and friendly but I decided that I wanted to get away.

I knew that I’d enjoyed teaching English as a foreign language in Paris and I thought to myself, how would it be if I went abroad, did some teaching, took my manuscript. had some sun … that’s how I came to live in Oporto in Portugal, teaching students aged eight to 62. They were mostly teenagers preparing for exams but there were also business people and housewives. The teenagers aged between 14 and 17 years were easily my favourite. They were so full of ideas and possibilities, forming opinions. I became head of that department.

After six months, I met my husband-to-be, a journalist. We married and the next year had Jessica – just before my 28th birthday. That was, without doubt, the best moment of my life. At that point, I had completed the first three chapters of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, almost exactly as they appear in the published book. The rest of the book was in rough draft.

Why did you move to Edinburgh?

It became clear that my marriage wasn’t working and I decided that it would be easier if I came back to Britain. My job wasn’t tremendously secure and, of course, it stopped completely over the summer holidays. I was worried about finding work during that period, especially with a small baby. I came to Edinburgh to stay with my sister for Christmas and I thought, I can be happy here. And I have been.

The only people I knew in Edinburgh were my sister and her best friend. I’d only met my sister’s husband once before. Most of my friends were in London but I felt that Edinburgh was the kind of city in which I wanted to bring up my child. Pretty soon I made some good friends. Maybe it was my Scottish blood calling me home.

How did you continue to write?

I decided to return to teaching to earn a living but first I had to get the qualification – a Post-Graduate Certificate in Education. That would take a year, so I knew that unless I made a push to finish the first book now, I might never finish it. I made a huge, superhuman effort. I would put Jessica in her pushchair, take her to the park and try to tire her out. When she fell asleep, I’d rush to a café and write. Not all the cafés I went to approved of me sitting there for a couple of hours having bought only one cup of coffee. But my brother-in-law had just opened his own café – Nicolson’s – and I thought they might be welcoming. I was careful to go when they weren’t busy and the staff were very nice. I used to joke about what I’d do for them if I ever got published and the book sold well . I still wasn’t sure that I’d ever be published. So, my first book was finished in Nicolson’s.

What happened after Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone was published?

My publisher was very encouraging and told me it was selling surprisingly well. There was no great fanfare – a good review in The Scotsman, followed by some others – but mostly it seems to have been word of mouth. Then my American publisher, Scholastic, bought the rights to the first book for more money than anyone had expected. The burst of publicity terrified me. I was teaching part-time and trying to write Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. I felt frozen by all the attention.

What made you decide to become a full-time writer?

It wasn’t an easy decision. I didn’t know whether this was all just a flash in the pan. And I had my daughter to think of. But I thought that I could probably afford to write full-time for two years, although I was risking my teaching career because I wouldn’t gain the experience necessary to go back to it as a career. When I won the Smarties Book Prize, sales started to climb. I got my first royalty cheque. I didn’t expect to earn any royalties – not for a first novel – so, that was a very proud moment.

Did you receive many letters from your readers?

I remember my first ever fan letter, from Francesca Gray. It began, “Dear Sir . ” I’ve since met her. There was a growing trickle of mail but when the book began to sell well in America, the letters poured in. I realised that I was fast becoming my own inefficient secretary. It was a really nice problem to have but it was time to hire someone to do things properly.

What happened when Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets was published?

It went almost straight to number one in the bestseller lists, which I thought was incredible. You have to remember that these things were taking me hugely by surprise. The fact is that it all happened very quickly but what mattered was that I had written a book I was proud of.

And Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban?

The idea that children would queue up in bookshops to buy copies of my books delighted me. But there are other more disconcerting sides to that level of publicity – having your photograph appear regularly in the papers is not something I ever anticipated. But all the time, children are reading the books. And we know now that adults are reading the books, too. And they like them. That’s what I remember when I’m feeling besieged.

Your books have now been translated into at least 50 languages. What do you think of the different versions?

I’ve recently received copies of the first Harry translated into Japanese – it’s beautiful. But I think the one I’m most impressed with is the Greek translation.

Sometimes I find strange little aberrations. In the Spanish translation, Neville Longbottom’s toad – which he’s always losing – has been translated as a turtle. Which surely makes losing it rather more difficult. And there’s no mention of water for it to live in. I don’t want to think too much about that . In the Italian translation, Professor Dumbledore has been translated into “Professore Silencio”. The translator has taken the “dumb” from the name and based the translation on that. In fact “dumbledore” is the old English word for bumblebee. I chose it because my image is of this benign wizard, always on the move, humming to himself, and I loved the sound of the word too. For me “Silencio” is a complete contradiction. But the book is very popular in Italy – so, it obviously doesn’t bother the Italians!

Do you think you’ll finish all seven Harry Potter novels?

Absolutely – if only for myself.

What will you do once you’ve finished the seventh?

It will be the most incredible thing to finish the books. It will have been a very long time to spend with those characters in my head and I know I’ll be sad to leave them. But I know I will leave them alone.

I’m sure I’ll always write, at least until I lose my marbles. I’m very, very lucky.

Because of Harry’s success. I don’t need to do it financially, nobody’s making me. I just need to do it for myself. Sometimes I think I’m temperamentally suited to being a moderately successful writer, with the focus of attention on the books rather than on me. It was wonderful enough just to be published. The greatest reward is the enthusiasm of the readers.

There are times – and I don’t want to sound ungrateful – when I would gladly give back some of the money in exchange for time and peace to write. That’s been the greatest strain, especially during the writing of the fourth book. I’ve become famous and I’m not very comfortable with that. Because of the fame, some really difficult things have happened and it’s required a great effort of will to shut them out. And I’ve also had to juggle the pressure to promote each book with the pressure from readers – and myself – to finish the next one. There have been some black weeks when I’ve wondered whether it’s worth it but I’ve ploughed on.

If you look at any famous person, there are always problems attached and they’re not pleasant. But I still know that I’m an extraordinarily lucky person, doing what I love best in all the world.

Leia mais

Newsround conversa exclusivamente com J.K. Rowling

Tradução: patriciaruiva
Revisão:

Mzimba, Lizo. “Newsround talks exclusively to J.K. Rowling,” CBBC Newsround, 19 September 2002
Lizo spoke exclusively to JK Rowling about her reaction to her court case victory and how book five, the Order of the Phoenix is going. Here’s the full interview!

Lizo: How do you feel now that the court case is over?

JK: I’m so relieved. This court case has dragged on for a few years. I’m a really happy woman today!

Lizo: How do you feel about the fact that she made up so many things to try and win the case?

JK: You can imagine the relief that finally the truth is actually out there. While it was going on there’s nothing you can say, you feel powerless. The judge found for us very quickly – I’m really happy.

Lizo: There have been quite a few rumours about when book five will be out – when do you think it’ll be ready?

JK: There’s a lot of book done – that’s all I want to say because if I give a date and then I pass it everyone will be upset.

I will say that I have a beginning, a middle and an end – you could read it all the way through and I know a lot of Harry Potter fans will say just give it to us but I’m perfectionist and I want a bit more time to tweak.

I really am getting there and I have to laugh when I read the bits about writers block because I don’t think I’ve ever been blocked in my life!

I’m loving the writing and now the revising and I’m getting on really well.

Lizo: You can’t tell us whether that will be weeks or month?

JK: I’d rather not say just in case I have a bus accident and things get knocked off track! It won’t be too long – that’s all I’ll say!

Lizo: Is there anything that you can tell us about book five? Any new characters?

JK: Well, we’ve obviously got a new Defence Against The Dark Arts teacher because Professor Moody wouldn’t want the job again having been locked in a trunk for a year! It’s a woman this time.

You may see a little more of Mundungus and there’s a new sorting hat song.

Lizo: Is the book going to be as long as book four was?

JK: Yes, it is looking that way – it’s already passed Azkaban, so I think yes, we are looking at Goblet of Fire length.

Lizo: Do you keep an eye on the internet and all the rumours about when the new book will be out?

JK: For my own mental health it’s best not to go onto the internet and type in Harry Potter too often because it’s scary!

I will say that while the court case was going on someone told me to go and have a look at a couple of the fan sites and I did and they were very very supportive of me.

It meant a lot to me at a time when I was wondering whether anyone would ever believe that I hadn’t stolen from someone else -I’d like to say thank you to those people.

Lizo: Is this book is definitely called The Order Of The Phoenix?

JK: Yes

Lizo: We’ve had loads of kids e mailing in saying how glad they are the court case is over – they’ve followed it for two years – what is your message to them?

JK: Thank you. Thank you for believing that I was telling the truth. It did mean a lot to me.

People often think that when you’re successful things like this don’t hurt you and they couldn’t be more wrong.

It was really hard for a while and I couldn’t be more grateful to those people for saying that – it means a lot to me.

Lizo: The other thing is that we’ve had so many e mails from children saying ‘lets not hassle JK about the book, when it’s ready we’ll be really eager to read it’ what’s your message to them?

JK: I like them even more! They’re very unusual children because even my own daughter has no problem asking me about the book!

Lizo: Finally, what’s your message to children who’ve been waiting for the next book for a two and half years?

JK: It’s coming and it’s a lot nearer than you’d think if you read some newspapers – just trust me.

Leia mais

J.K. Rowling nos seus dias de pobreza

Tradução: Salas Wulfric
Revisão: Adriana Snape**

Goldwin, Clare. “J K Rowling on her Days of Poverty,” The Daily Mirror, June 2002
AT FIRST glance it’s a rags-to-riches tale that could have come straight from the imagination of JK Rowling herself.

A penniless writer lives in a freezing flat and nurses cups of coffee for hours at a time in a warm cafe, where she sits with her baby girl and writes the books that will one day make her fame and fortune.

This is the popular version of JK’s own life story but the truth of being a single parent was no romantic fairy story for the Harry Potter author.

This will become apparent when Bloomsbury publishes Magic – a collection of short stories sold to raise money for the National Council For One Parent Families’ Magic Million Appeal.

The book, to be published next month, is co-edited by Chancellor Gordon Brown’s wife, Sarah, who is also patron of the NCOPF, and novelist Gil McNeil.

They persuaded 18 of Britain’s most acclaimed writers – including Sue Townsend, Fay Weldon, Jo Harris, Arabella Weir, Meera Syal and Ben Okri – to contribute a story for free.

Jo Rowling is the charity’s ambassador and has written the foreword.

In it, Jo gives her most searingly honest account yet of the poverty and humiliation she faced bringing up her daughter alone.

Thanks to Harry Potter, Jo, 36, is now a multi-millionaire who can cater for her daughter’s every need.

But the indignities she endured as a lone parent still burn strong.

“I remember reaching the supermarket checkout, counting out the money in coppers, finding out I was two pence short of a tin of baked beans and feeling I had to pretend I had mislaid a £10 note for the benefit of the bored girl at the till,” says Jo.

“Similarly unappreciated acting skills were required for my forays into Mothercare, where I would pretend to be examining clothes I could not afford for my daughter.

“All the time I would be edging ever closer to the baby-changing room where they offered a small supply of free nappies.

“I hated dressing my longed-for child from charity shops.

“I hated relying on the kindness of relatives when it came to her new shoes.

“I tried furiously hard not to feel jealous of other children’s beautifully decorated, well-stocked bedrooms when we went to friends’ houses to play.”

Jo had moved to Portugal to teach English in 1991 and met a Portuguese television journalist. They married in October 1992 but Jo left with her baby the following year.

“My story starts in 1993, when my marriage ended,” Jo explains in the forward. “I was living abroad and in full-time employment when I gave birth to my daughter.”

LEAVING her ex-husband meant leaving her job and returning to Britain with two suitcases full of possessions.

“I knew perfectly well that I was walking into poverty,” she adds, “but I truly believed that it would be a matter of months before I was back on my feet.

“I had enough money saved to put down a deposit on a rented flat and buy a high chair, cot and other essentials.

“When my savings were gone, I settled down to life on slightly less than £70 a week.

“Poverty, as I soon found out, is a lot like childbirth – you know that it’s going to hurt before it happens but you’ll never know how much until you’ve experienced it.

“Some articles written about me have come close to romanticising the time I spent on Income Support, because the well-worn cliche of the writer starving in the garret is so much more picturesque than the bitter reality of living in poverty with a child.

“The endless little humiliations of life on benefits – and remember that six out of 10 families headed by a lone parent live in poverty – receive very little media coverage unless they are followed by what seems to be a swift and Cinderella-like reversal of fortune.”

As Jo was to discover, finding work and looking after a small child at the same time was an almost impossible juggling act.

“I wanted to work part-time,” she explains. “When I asked my health visitor about the possibility of a couple of afternoons’ state childcare a week she explained, very kindly, that places for babies were reserved for those who were deemed ‘at risk’.

“Her exact words were: ‘You’re coping too well’.

“I was allowed to earn a maximum of £15 a week before my Income Support and Housing Benefit was docked.

“Full-time private childcare was so exorbitant that I would need to find a full-time job paying well above the national average. I had to decide whether my baby would rather be handed over to somebody else for most of her waking hours, or be cared for by her mother in far from luxurious surroundings.

“I chose the latter option, though constantly feeling I had to justify my choice at length whenever anybody asked me that nasty question: ‘So what do you do?’ The honest answer to that question was that I worried continually – I devoted hours to writing a book I doubted would ever be published, I tried hard to hold on to the hope that our financial situation would improve.

“And when I was not too exhausted to feel strong emotion, I was swamped with anger at the portrayal of single mothers by certain politicians and newspapers as feckless teenagers in search of the Holy Grail – the council flat – when 97 per cent of us had long since left our teens.”

Eventually, Jo was able to train as a teacher after a friend lent her the money for childcare. And she explains she believes there is no reason to be ashamed of being a single parent. “The sub-text of much of the vilification of lone parents is that couple families are intrinsically superior yet, during my time as a school teacher, I met a number of disruptive, damaged children whose home contained two parents.

“There are those who still believe head-count defines a ‘real’ family, who believe that marriage is the only ‘right’ context in which to have children. But I have never felt the remotest shame about being a single parent.

“I have the temerity to be rather proud of the period when I did three jobs single-handedly – the unpaid work of two parents and the salaried job as a teacher.

“There is a wealth of evidence to suggest that it is not single-parenthood but poverty that causes some children to do less well than others.

“When you take poverty out of the equation, children from one-parent families can do just as well as children from couple families.”

Jo has not forgotten how far she has come from the time when she was unable to afford a tin of baked beans and prayed for fine weather to avoid a big gas bill.

“I am fully aware, every single day, of how lucky I am,” she writes.

“I am lucky because I do not have to worry about my daughter’s financial security any more, because what used to be Benefit day comes around and there’s still food in the fridge and the bills are paid.

“I had a talent that I could exercise without financial outlay. But anyone thinking of using me as an example of how single parents can break out of the poverty trap might as well point at Oprah Winfrey and declare that there is no more racism in America.

“People just like me are facing the same obstacles to a full realisation of their potential every day and their children are missing opportunities alongside them.

“They are not asking for hand-outs, they are not scheming for council flats, they are simply asking for the support they need to break free of life on benefits and support their own children.”

Jo became a patron for the NCOPF two years ago and has donated £500,000 to the charity.

SHE says: “The National Council For One Parent Families is neither anti-marriage nor a propagandist for ‘going it alone’.

“It exists to help parents bringing up children alone, for example, in the aftermath of a relationship breakdown or the death of a partner, when children are faced with a new kind of family and one parent is left coping with the work of two – often on a considerably reduced income.

“It provides invaluable advice and practical support on a wide range of issues affecting lone parents and their children – and I am very proud to be associated with it.”

As Jo explains in the foreword, her involvement came about in an appropriate way for a single mother.

“Andy Keen Downs, the charity’s deputy director, came to see me and sat down in my habitually untidy kitchen, pulled a sheaf of notes from his briefcase and embarked on what I’m quite sure would have been a marvellously persuasive, well-constructed and beautifully delivered speech.

“‘Andy,’ I interrupted, in that harassed voice by which lone parents can often be identified, ‘you’d like me to be a patron, wouldn’t you?’

“‘OK, I’ll do it but could we please discuss the details on the way to school, because sports day starts in five minutes.’

“And so we discussed the National Council For One Parent Families while watching the egg and spoon races.

“It was a highly fitting start, I felt, for my association with a charity that is devoted to helping those parents whose lives are a constant balancing act.

“But I didn’t need to hear Andy’s well-rehearsed persuasive arguments on sports day. I had already made up my mind that it was time to put my money where my mouth had been ever since I experienced the reality of single-parenthood in Britain.

“I want to offer my very deepest thanks to, not only the authors of this book, but to everybody, who, through buying this book, contributes to our appeal.”

The proceeds from the sale of the book will go towards the charity’s Magic Million Appeal, whose funds will help maintain the broad range of services offered to lone parents who want to pull themselves out of the poverty trap while bringing up happy, well-adjusted children.

“You are offering hope to families who are too often scapegoated rather than supported,” Jo concludes, “families who could do with a lot less Dursleyish stigmatism and a little more magic in their lives.”

Magic, edited by Sarah Brown and Gil McNeil, is priced at £6.99. For every edition sold, £1 will go to the Magic Million Appeal, which aims to raise £1million to fund better information services for lone parents.

Leia mais

Sobre pais solteiros e pensionistas idosos

Tradução: Rö. Granger
Revisão: Adriana Snape
*OK Categorias e Conteúdo

Aldrick, Philip. “Lone parents are poorer than OAPs, says J K Rowling,” The Daily Telegraph, 6 December 2000

SINGLE parents are poorer than pensioners, J K Rowling, author of the Harry Potter novels, said yesterday. She urged the Government to do more for them.

Miss Rowling, who is a single parent, said: “Poverty is a lot like childbirth. You know it’s going to hurt before it happens, but you’ll never know how much until you’ve experienced it. I had naively supposed the system would be geared to helping those determined to support themselves and their children. How much I had to learn.”

She accused Ann Widdecombe, shadow home secretary, of negative stereotyping by suggesting that there was a “preferred norm” for raising children. Miss Rowling, a former teacher, told the annual conference of the National Council for One Parent Families that disruptive children could just as easily have two parents, living together. “Vote for the party who offers the best deal for lone parents and their children – and urge them to do more.”

Miss Rowling, 34, who earned about £20 million last year, has spoken of writing her first Harry Potter novel while living as a single mother in a “mouse-infested” flat in Edinburgh on £70 a week. She left her husband, a Portuguese journalist, after a three-year marriage in 1993.

The “baseless stereotype of the teenage mother eager to get her hands on the taxpayers’ money in the form of a council flat” angered her. She accused John Major, the former Tory Prime Minister, and Miss Widdecombe of perpetuating the myth.

“Mr Major gave a speech in which he attributed the breakdown of discipline among schoolchildren to lone parents. I am as angry about that speech now as I was when I first heard it. I taught more than one disruptive, damaged child whose home contained two married parents, apparently incapable of providing a loving or stable environment.

“A quarter of all families living in Britain are headed by a lone parent. Why are we, as a society, ready to ignore this state of affairs? I am typical of the vast majority of lone parents. I never set out to raise my daughter alone.”

Gordon Brown, the Chancellor, said he was “moved” by her comments. He promised to take one million children out of poverty by the end of the next parliament and to make families a priority in the next Budget.

Leia mais

J.K. Rowling: a feiticeira por trás de Harry Potter

Tradução: {patylda}
Revisão:

Boquet, Tim. “J.K. Rowling: The Wizard Behind Harry Potter,” Reader’s Digest, December 2000

Author J. K. Rowling explains the magic of the strange young boy who has cast a spell over publishing-and her life

“I can’t wait! I can’t wait,” cries ten-year-old Alula Greenberg-White, hugging herself in expectation. It’s 9am outside a large bookshop in north London and Alula is at the head of a queue of 100 excited children and parents. They peer through the windows at stacks of a 640-page novel, eyes searching for the small strawberry- blonde Pied Piper who has brought them here-and to bookshops round the globe-and who is somewhere inside nursing a coffee.
“I’m really not a morning person,” admits J. K. Rowling as she flexes her fingers in preparation for another marathon signing of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, the fourth volume of a publishing phenomenon.
Children in more than 30 countries are just wild about Harry, their bespectacled hero who discovers on his eleventh birthday that he is a wizard. For the few who don’t know: Harry inherited his magical powers from his parents who have been slaughtered by the evil wizard Lord Voldemort. Harry, who bears a lightning scar on his forehead, also the handiwork of Voldemort, then has a series of white-knuckle adventures at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. This is housed in a remote Scottish castle, where mail is delivered to pupils by their owls.
Rowling has so enchanted children with her imagination and a vivid cast-redoubtable Hermione Granger and plucky Ron Weasley, Harry’s sidekicks, sinister Professor Snape and Hagrid, the endearing gamekeeper who likes a drink and has a passion for hatching dragons-that the first four stories in the series have taken up permanent residence at the top of the best-seller lists. To date, they have sold an astonishing 41 million copies.
On July 8, UK publication day of Goblet of Fire, an astonishing 372,775 hardback copies were sold. In the US-where Rowling is believed to be the first author ever to occupy the top three slots on The New York Times best-seller list at the same time-a nation of bleary-eyed children stayed up for the midnight launch to snaffle 3.8 million volumes.
In this digital age when it is said kids don’t give a fig for the printed word, Joanne Kathleen Rowling has turned more children on to reading than any living author. And with a film of the first book in production and a range of Harry merchandise ready to ride into the shops on its back, she has one of the highest profiles on the planet. Yet the reality is a softly spoken, bird-like 35-year-old, who shifts on the sofa as she considers the question: what is it about Harry that captivates in all languages and cultures? “Magic has a universal appeal. I don’t believe in it in the way that I describe in my books, but I’d love it to be real,” she says, picking up speed like the Hogwarts Express, which at the beginning of every term takes the children to school from platform nine and three-quarters at London’s King’s Cross station.
“The starting point for the whole of Harry’s world is ‘What if it were real?’ And I work from there.” She has never had a market in mind. “I started writing these books for me, but I really like my readers. They are very likeable people.” She glances at the queue outside, which must now be 300 strong. “Children are a writer’s dream. They are not interested in sales figures. They want to know why the plot works a certain way. They know the books back to front and talk about the characters as though they are living, mutual friends of ours.” They mirror Rowling’s own feelings perfectly.
But with its public school dorms and house points, isn’t it all just too British? “Wherever I go, children seem to like the Britishness of the stories, even if they are probably getting a very rosy picture of what school in Britain is like!”
J.K. Rowling: The Wizard Behind Harry Potter 2 Tim Bouquet

And they all know the Rowling story. She was born in 1965 in Chipping Sodbury, South Gloucestershire-an appropriate birthplace for someone who loves strange, but believable, names. Writing from the age of six and with two unpublished novels in the drawer, she was stuck on a train in 1990 when Harry walked into her mind, fully formed. She spent the next five years constructing the plots of seven books, one for every year of his secondary school life.
Rowling says she started writing the first book, Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, in Portugal, where she was teaching English and had married journalist Jorge Arantes. The marriage lasted just over a year, but produced baby Jessica.
Leaving Portugal, she arrived in Edinburgh in 1993 to stay with her younger sister Di, a lawyer, with just enough money for a deposit on a flat and some baby equipment. “I was depressed and angry. Angry that I had messed up my life and let my daughter down.” She went to visit a friend of her sister’s who had a baby boy. “His room was full of toys. Jessica’s toys fitted into a shoebox. I came home and cried my eyes out.”
The tears did not last. Harry’s bravery strikes a chord with children because he is full of anxieties but gets by on luck and nerve. Rowling agrees she is much the same. “It’s not pure luck,” she explains. “He has the will to get through and I never lost that. When you are really on your uppers, you don’t sit there and cry, you try and get out of it.” However, stories of an impoverished single mother living in a rat-infested bedsit and scribbling her way to wealth in an Edinburgh coffee shop are journalistic inventions. “I am a single mum, I did, and still do, write in cafes and I was broke,” says Rowling, who recently gave £500,000 to the National Council for One Parent Families and became the charity’s first-ever ambassador. “Those early stories neglected to mention that I come from a middle-class background, I have a degree in French and Classics and that working as a supply teacher was my intended bridge out of poverty.” And the bedsit? It was a mouse-infested two-bedroom flat. At first nobody wanted to publish Harry Potter. “The fact that it was set in a boarding school was very un-PC as far as most publishers were concerned,” Joanne explains. She was told that the plot, like her sentence construction, was too complex and too long. “That unnerved me because I knew it was going to be the shortest book of the series!” Refusing to compromise, she at last found a publisher, Bloomsbury, and, armed with an £8,000 grant from the Scottish Arts Council, ploughed into book two, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.
In 1997 she received her first royalty cheque for Philosopher’s Stone. Until then Rowling was “a happily obscure person”. By book three the world, fuelled by word of mouth and some astute marketing, went crazy for Harry, slapping a row of noughts on Rowling’s bank balance and turning her life upside down. Day and night she had journalists knocking on the unanswered door of her flat. Success, it was reported, had turned J. K. Rowling into a paranoid recluse. As ever, the truth is prosaic. Joanne does get out, but writing four books back to back has been totally time-consuming, especially when a massive flaw in the plot of Goblet of Fire took three months to fix, delaying delivery of the manuscript. “I am not an editor’s dream!” she laughs.
J.K. Rowling: The Wizard Behind Harry Potter 3 Tim Bouquet

She claims never to read what is written about her and is fiercely protective of Jessica, now seven. On her first day at primary school, excited 10 and 11-year-olds surrounded Jessica, clamouring to know about Harry and his creator. “At first Jessica liked it-she’s a feisty little thing.” But when the attention didn’t ease off, Rowling went into school and asked the older children: “Could you lay off a bit? She’s very young and she can’t answer your questions because she hasn’t read the books.” In return, she did a reading and a question-and-answer session with the two top classes. “It was fun and solved the problem.” Jessica is now a fully-fledged Potter fan, but like every other child she has to wait for publication day to find out what Harry does next. A broomstick’s hop away from the bookshop, Annie Williams, deputy head of Christ Church Primary School in down-at-heel Camden, swears by Harry. “When I read the Philosopher’s Stone to a class of 11-year-olds, ten of whom have special needs,
they were so inspired that I prepared worksheets based on the book to help them with grammar.” Soon they were writing newspaper articles about the story, and postcards from Hogwarts. “Their written work has improved dramatically.”
So what has Rowling got that other writers haven’t? “Potions, intrigue, magic and ‘what happens next’,” says Williams. “The same formula Shakespeare used.” Rowling may write about wizards, ghosts, elves and the hippogriff, which is half-horse, half-eagle, but her books are driven with all the suspense and twists of detective novels. Perhaps that’s why Harry is also hugely popular with adults. Stories of parents muscling in to read each new volume ahead of their children are common.
“I love a good whodunnit and my passion is plot construction. Readers loved to be tricked, but not conned,” Rowling says, warming to her theme. “The best twist ever in literature is in Jane Austen’s Emma. To me she is the target of perfection at which we shoot in vain.”
J.K. Rowling: The Wizard Behind Harry Potter 4 Tim Bouquet

The Harry Potter film is being directed by Chris Columbus, who worked on Home Alone and Mrs Doubtfire, and has a predominantly British cast, much to Rowling’s relief.
“When I first met screenwriter Steve Kloves (who wrote and directed The Fabulous Baker Boys) the fact that he was American made me spiky and I felt he was going to mutilate my baby. But as soon as he said his favourite character was Hermione I melted, because she is very close to me. I was very like her at that age.” Kloves loves Rowling’s characters just the way they are. “From the first page she had me. There’s a genuine edge and darkness to her books. One reason they’re so popular with children is that there’s no pandering whatsoever.” While the death of a well-loved character in book four is upsetting, Rowling believes that it is only by letting children experience the real consequences of evil actions that they can understand Harry’s moral choices. The actor to play Harry was not cast for months. More than 40,000 young hopefuls put their names into the hat to star as the world’s most famous wizard. But when Rowling saw young British actor Daniel Radcliffe’s screen test, she knew the 11-year-old was perfect for the part. Rowling’s quality control is legendary, as is her obsession with accuracy. She’s thrilled with Stephen Fry’s taped version of the books, outraged that an Italian dust jacket shows Harry minus his glasses. “Don’t they understand that they are the clue to his vulnerability?” One person who is not there to see and share her success is her half-Scottish, half-French mother who died of multiple sclerosis in 1990, aged just 45. She had no idea that Joanne had started writing about Harry Potter.
In a moving scene in Philosopher’s Stone, Harry stares into a magic mirror that can let him see what he most craves in life. In it he sees his dead parents seemingly alive. It is a rare autobiographical insight into Rowling’s feelings about her own loss. “I miss her daily,” she says. “I still hear her voice. It’s very painful…” For the first time she stutters to a halt and stares at the floor as though searching for a lost thread.
“My father, a retired aircraft engineer, is immensely proud,” she says. “He would have been proud whatever I’d succeeded at. But books were my mother’s big passion. Having a daughter who was a writer would have been a very big deal, even if I’d only sold three copies.” She’s sold a few more than that, but this unpretentious woman with the loud percussive laugh has only recently learned to admit that she enjoys being rich-she is rumoured to be worth around £20 million. “I bought a house in London; that’s pretty extravagant! The biggest luxury is that it stops you worrying. Not a day goes by when I’m not thankful for that.”
J.K. Rowling: The Wizard Behind Harry Potter 5 Tim Bouquet

Back in the London bookshop the doors burst open. Camera flashguns blaze. Faster than a game of Quidditch, the aerobatic broomstick-basketball at which Harry excels, the roped-off route to the signing table is twitching with small trainers. How does Rowling view life after Harry? “I never forget A. A. Milne,” she says, pen in hand. “When he wrote for adults every review he ever got referred to Pooh, Tigger and Piglet. What appeals to me is sending in manuscripts for other books under a pseudonym. Anonymity was a nice place to be.” But when she sees ten-year-old Alula’s smiling face she relaxes visibly, happy to be popular children’s author J. K. Rowling. “Hi, how are you?” she asks, as though greeting a long-lost friend. In seconds the two of them are huddled, in cahoots about the latest adventures of the boy wizard. Afterwards, as her mother joins other parents at the till, Alula says her heroine has surpassed her expectations. “She’s so friendly and she answered all my questions!” For Alula, a Harry Potter book can never be too long. While others try to fathom Rowling’s success, this ten-year-old knows why the magic works. “Because it’s exciting.” Spills and spells. It really is that simple.

Leia mais

Pottermania em Vancouver

Tradução: Sarah Lee
Revisão: Adriana Snape
*OK Categorias e Conteúdo

Garcia, Frank. “Harry Pottermania in Vancouver, with J.K. Rowling: At the author’s press conference, adults take a back seat to kids,” Cinescape, 16 November 2000

At a J.K. Rowling press conference, it’s the adults who take a backseat to the children sitting in the front row. Almost half a dozen boys and girls who are playing reporter clutch their pens and pads, asking questions to their favorite children’s author about her phenomenal ‘Harry Potter’ book series. At times, adults listening intently to the children’s questions seemed bemused by their ability to play in the same sandbox. In the room are veteran reporters from local newspapers and television stations. One television news reporter, a mother herself, grins throughout the ‘young adults’ portion of the press conference as she points her camera’s boom mike to a young girl in the front row asking questions. Indeed, at the end of the conference, a few interviews were given by the kids to the News Hour reporter, discussing their love for Harry Potter.

On Oct. 25, 2000, just prior to two scheduled appearances as part of the Vancouver Writers and Readers Festival event, J.K. Rowling met with reporters to discuss her book tour. Just 24 hours earlier, she read a chapter of her fourth book to an estimated 12,000 fans at Toronto’s Skydome stadium, which is believed to be the largest author reading event ever.

‘I think that a reading still can be a very intimate experience, even if a lot of people are there,’ said Rowling. ‘However, undeniably, I can’t have as much one-to-one contact. It’s a battle for me. My post bag, as you can imagine, is full with thousands of requests to do readings at bookstores, signings at small bookstores and to visit at schools individually. And I used to do that. It was the most fun I had apart from the writing.

‘But if I did do that now, I would never see my daughter. I would never write another book. I would never eat or sleep. So I have to cut my cloth. I can say, ‘Well, I won’t read any more,’ which I would really miss. Or I could do bigger readings where I reach more people at once and that’s the way I’ve chosen to go.

‘Next year, I probably won’t do any readings,’ continued Rowling, who adds that charity readings will be her single exception. ‘I just want to do writing, so the Skydome is one big bang; do one big reading and then we’ll take a break for a while because I need to do writing. I want to be writing. So basically I’m coming to the end of two weeks of exposure to the outer reaches of the madness. Then, I’ll go home and life will be normal again!’

Statistically speaking, the Harry Potter phenomenon has been the magical publishing story of the year. Newsweek magazine estimates that with just four of seven books in the series published so far, there are 35 million copies in print, with translations in 40 languages. Conservatively, it’s estimated that the books have sold $480 million in three years. Forbes magazine ranks Rowling at number 25 in a list of the most powerful celebrities. That’s a heady achievement for a woman who conjured up a magical universe while she was on welfare.

‘I thought I’d written something that maybe a handful of people would like, so this has been something of a shock, to say the least!’ said Rowling as she sat at the front table of the room, facing her captive audience at the conference. ‘For myself, the height of my ambition was someday I could sign a check in a shop and someone would say, ‘Oh, you wrote my favorite book!’ That they would recognize my name, not that I ever expected to be physically recognized, of course. As a matter of fact, that did happen to me! [The clerk] said to me, ‘Are you the Joanne Rowling?’ and I went the color of my shirt. That was great.’

Although the Harry Potter book series is marketed as children’s books, many adults like them, too. But ultimately, Rowling is writing for herself. ‘I get asked, ‘Who do you have in mind when you write?’’ said Rowling. ‘’Is it your daughter or is it children you’ve met?’ No, it’s just me. I’m very selfish. I just write for me. So the humor in the books is what I find funny. On that level, I’m not surprised that adults share my humor. I didn’t expect what has happened, so I’m constantly surprised.’

And because she is writing for herself, Rowling explains that she is ruthlessly stringent about keeping the stories’ plotting on track as initially mapped out. ‘The one thing that keeps me on course, above all others, is that I want to finish these seven books and look back and think that whatever happened, however much this hurricane whirled around me, I stayed true to what I wanted to write. This is my Holy Grail; that when I finish writing book seven, I can say, hand on my heart, ‘I didn’t change a thing. I wrote this story I meant to write. If I lost readers along the way, well, so be it. But I still told my story. The one I wanted to write.’

‘That, without wishing to sound too corny, is what I owe to my characters, that we don’t get deflected by either adoration or criticism. I think it would be dangerous to start playing to the gallery. I don’t think it wise to listen too much either to compliments or criticism. Having said that, after the writing, which is easily my favorite thing, the reason I keep coming out and doing this stuff is to reach readers. I think I have the most likeable readership in the world. They are very nice people.’

However, her writing process isn’t so set that there’s no room for flexibility—or fun. ‘The books aren’t so planned in meticulous details that I can’t have fun while writing,’ said Rowling. ‘I invent stuff as I go. A lot of magical creatures and objects get invented while I’m writing a book. But what’s planned is the skeleton of the plot. I deviate slightly, but I have to get from point A to point B because obviously, I can’t do C, D, E, F [with doing that first].’

Meeting and greeting people in her travels has provided Rowling with many adventures. Rowling said books signings are ‘a bottomless pit. You start signing, you won’t finish!’ If there’s one thing about the entire Harry Potter phenomenon that surprises her the most, it’s quite probably this: ‘I’ve never had a rude child, which to me, is incredible. Never once has one throw a tantrum. I’ve never had a child ask for more than I can give. Never once have I had a child [for] which I didn’t feel anything but affection. Thousands of them.’

Alas, adults are a different story. ‘In the last tour, in the U.K., I finally lost my temper,’ grinned Rowling. ‘And I have a fairly long fuse for my readers, but halfway down a queue of about 1,000 people, I had to make a train. This was a train to see my daughter, so this was not a thing I wanted to miss. Halfway down the line, I’ve got this guy with every bit of Harry Potter paraphernalia he could get his paws on and he wanted them all personalized. And I said to him, ‘If I do this for you, that means 12 children at the end of this queue won’t get their books signed.’ And he argued, and I lost my temper. But eBay, ya know? eBay [and being able to auction this signed paraphernalia off] explains a lot of it.’

The most frequently asked question she gets from adults, said Rowling, is ‘’What’s the secret? What’s the formula?’ I never analyze it. I think it would be dangerous for me to start analyzing it in that way. Number one, it would stop being fun. Number two, I’m not sure I know. The correct people to ask are the readers.’

Deep and obscure questions occasionally appear from unlikely quarters. ‘I got asked in New York, ‘How does the Wizard economy work?’ Now, in fact, I know how it works, but no one had bothered to ask me that ever before, so that was very satisfying to have the chance to explain. Predictably, a Wall Street journalist actually asked me that!’

A more common topic that everyone wants to know about, but few people have any real answers for, is, ‘How do you deal with sudden fame?’ ‘I’m still learning,’ replied Rowling. ‘I would definitely not say I’m on top of it. I would say for the first two years of being in the paper, I was in denial. I kept thinking ‘It will go away.’ And about [the time of ] the publishing of the third book, I had to accept it wasn’t going to go away any time soon. Which is a probably healthier place to be. It will go away. That’s the nature of the game and I truly believe I will be happy. And I will have fond memories of the time I was famous. When I’m 90, I’ll say ‘Harry Potter was once very big, you know!’

‘In the short term, to get some peace back won’t be a bad thing. People say to me, ‘Can you walk down the street unmolested?’ In Edinburgh, it’s the exception, really. Anyone can come up to me. So either Edinburgh people are really cool and pretend not to notice, to leave you alone, or they genuinely don’t notice me. I think probably the latter. Compared to an actress or a politician, I really get nothing. It’s just to me that it was a huge shock. Because I didn’t expect anything at all.’

A barometer of just how much impact Harry Potter books have had on their readers has arrived in the form of 10 contest-winning essays commissioned by Scholastic Books, the American publisher of the Harry Potter books. Entrants were asked to write an essay answering the question, ‘How Harry Potter has changed my life.’ Each winning essay revealed diverse, poignant stories from its children writers. All 10 winners were given a breakfast with Rowling. The essays were published and featured in USA Today on Oct.19, 2000. (The stories are also available at USA Today’s Website.)

While a success, Rowling initially had her doubts about the event, though. ‘When I heard that they’d done this, I must admit I was slightly dubious,’ said Rowling. ‘Cynical. I thought this was a tall order, to say to people how Harry changed their life. But the essays were quite incredible. Some were very, very moving and painful stories. They were children who had very hard times. I’m not sure I want to share too much about that because it’s their painful lives.

‘The funniest one, by far, was Scott MacDonald [a 13-year old from Crownsville, Md.], who’d been quite a poor reader and then his grades dramatically improved because he’d been reading books so much and his writing improved. And he wrote me this letter, ‘And if you don’t believe me’ because of this paragraph quoting his grades, ‘You can call my teacher’ and he gave the full number and address. ‘Don’t call me a liar!’ [he said]. He was very sweet. I loved meeting him.’

Readers and critics have praised Rowling’s fantastic imagination in all the books. Discussing the power of imagination, Rowling noted, ‘It is an overwhelming feeling. An incredible feeling. I feel that bit is truly magical. To come here and sit opposite an adult or child who knows my characters back to front, who will argue with me about what’s inside my head, it’s the most wonderful thing. It really, really is!’

Journalists at the conference were obviously very keen about learning more details about upcoming books. Rowling happily supplied some answers. ‘I know exactly what happens to most of the characters in their past and their future. I know far more, really, than the reader needs to know, but that just makes me comfortable to know that there are no surprises for me. I know exactly what is going on.’

However, invented characters can sometimes take a life of their own and surprise their masters. ‘Hermione gave me a lot of trouble!’ laughed Rowling. ‘She was really misbehaving. She developed this big political conscience about the House elves. Well, she wanted to go her own way, and for two chapters, she just went wandering off. I just let her do it and then I scrapped two chapters and kept a few bits. That I liked. That’s the most trouble anyone’s ever given me, but it was fun so I gave her her head.’

In an attempt to glean more tidbits on Harry’s future, Rowling was asked if young Potter would become a headboy. ‘That’s weird,’ responded Rowling. ‘My daughter is obsessed with that. I don’t know why. She’s seven and she keeps saying ‘He’s going to be headboy, isn’t he?’ And I’m saying, ‘Maybe he wouldn’t want to be headboy…’ ‘No, he would!’ It’s funny you should say that. I’m not going to tell you which.’

A question also surfaced surrounding Harry Potter’s non-magical relatives, the Muggles who have always tortured or mistreated Harry, because of their fear of magic. For revenge, Harry has magically tortured his cousin Dudley. ‘I like torturing them,’ said Rowling. ‘You should keep an eye on Dudley. It’s probably too late for Aunt Petunia and Uncle Vernon. I feel sorry for Dudley. I might joke about him, but I feel truly sorry for him because I see him as just as abused as Harry. Though, in possibly a less obvious way. What they are doing to him is inept, really. I think children recognize that. Poor Dudley. He’s not being prepared for the world at all, in any reasonable or compassionate way, so I feel sorry for him. But there’s something funny about him, also. The pig’s tail was irresistible.’

As the conference came to a close, there was time for two final comments: ‘What kind of a kid was I? Short, squat. Very thick National Health glasses. That doesn’t mean anything to you, does it? National Health free glasses were like bottle bottoms. That’s why Harry wears glasses. Shy? Yes, I was a mixture of insecurities and bossy. I was very bossy to my sister, but quite quiet with strangers. Very bookish. Terrible at sports. That part about Harry being able to fly so well is probably total wish fulfillment. I was very uncoordinated. [I was] never happier than when [I was] reading or writing. [I] wanted to be a ballerina at one brief point, which is very embarrassing in retrospect because I was virtually spherical.’

Finally, in her parting words, Rowling said, ‘I wrote the book for me. I never expected it to do this. That it has done [so well] is wonderful. I mean, if I can honestly believe that I created some readers, then I feel I wasn’t just taking up space on this Earth. I feel very, very proud. But I didn’t set out to do that and my first loyalty, as I say, is to the story as I wanted to write it. I’m hopeful that my readers will stay with it.’

Stepping up to leave, Rowling almost gets out the door until a young girl at the front row stretches her arm forward with a sketch drawing. It catches Rowling’s eyes. She hesitates and steps forward to take the drawing and look at it. She pulls out a pen and offers autographs. Photographers and television news cameramen quickly crowd around her, documenting the event, as the young children excitedly open their books and prepare them for an impromptu signing. A still photographer crouches from the floor, looking up with his camera, attempting to get the right angle. After signing a few books, Rowling and her people usher out of the room and forward into a day in which she performed two readings to a total of 10,000 eager fans at the Pacific Coliseum.

Editor’s note: Cinescape is now a part of Fandom.com

©2000 Mania Entertainment, LLC. All rights reserved.

Leia mais
Carregando